Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 4, 2025

Real-Time Cardiac Mapping with a Noninvasive Imageless Electrocardiographic Imaging System
Published on: April 11, 2025
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Guided by Echocardiography, MRI, and CT Imaging: A Randomized Controlled Study
Rasmus Borgquist1, Marcus Carlsson2, Hanna Markstad3
1Cardiology Division, Arrhythmia Section, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Skane University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Selecting the left ventricular (LV) lead by echocardiography-derived mechanical activation did not improve cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) response rates. This imaging-guided approach did not significantly increase responders or reduce heart failure hospitalizations compared to standard care.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Imaging
- Electrophysiology
Background:
- Left ventricular (LV) lead placement is critical for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) success, but optimal lead positioning remains a challenge.
- Current strategies for LV lead placement in CRT are debated, impacting patient outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate if selecting the LV target segment by echocardiography-derived late mechanical activation, using multimodality imaging, can increase responder rates to CRT.
- To determine if this imaging-guided approach improves clinical and echocardiographic outcomes in CRT patients.
Main Methods:
- A prospective, blinded randomized controlled trial was conducted on 102 patients indicated for CRT.
- Optimal LV lead location was identified using radial strain echocardiography, cardiac CT, and MRI, targeting the latest mechanically activated segment free of transmural scar.
- The primary endpoint was a reduction in LV end-systolic volume by ≥15% at 6 months.
Main Results:
- Fifty-six percent of patients were LV end-systolic volume responders, similar to the control group (55%, p=0.96).
- No significant difference was observed in improvement of New York Heart Association functional class (71% vs. 67%, p=0.43).
- While the intervention group showed a trend towards fewer death or heart failure hospitalizations within 2 years (2% vs. 10%, p=0.07), this was not statistically significant.
Conclusions:
- Radial strain-guided LV lead placement, combined with multimodality imaging, did not significantly increase clinical or echocardiographic response rates in CRT patients.
- The strategy did not lead to a significant reduction in death or heart failure hospitalizations.
- Optimal LV lead placement guided by advanced imaging did not provide a significant benefit over standard CRT implantation strategies.
More Related Videos
12:45Benefits of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in an Asynchronous Heart Failure Model Induced by Left Bundle Branch Ablation and Rapid Pacing
Published on: December 11, 2017
08:31A Simplified Stepwise Approach to Echo Guidance during Percutaneous Mitral Valve Repair
Published on: October 16, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System IV: CMRI
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System I:Echocardiography
Indications: Echocardiography is utilized to diagnose heart failure, valve disorders, and myocardial infarction. It also assesses cardiac structures' size, shape, and motion,...