Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 4, 2025

Multidisciplinary Approach to Obesity Management: A Case Report
Published on: May 30, 2025
Anthropometric and blood pressure changes in patients with or without nutritional counselling during cardiac
G Valentino1,2, J E Galgani2,3, M Álamos2
1División de Enfermedades Cardiovasculares, Escuela de Medicina, Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Background:
Whether a patient's outcomes are better when receiving nutritional counselling during cardiac rehabilitation (CR) has been scarcely described. We compared changes in weight, waist circumference (WC) and blood pressure (BP) in patients attending CR with and without nutritional counselling.
Methods:
A retrospective analytical study was conducted in which two groups of patients who completed a phase II CR (36 sessions) were compared: CONTROL [n = 144, mean (SD) age = 59 (12) years, 17% females], comprising patients without nutritional counselling (attended between 2003 and 2009), and NUT [n = 128, mean (SD) age = 60 (13) years, 27% females], comprising patients with dietitian-delivered nutritional counselling (attended between 2010 and 2019). Repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to compare changes in weight, WC, and BP during CR between groups. Logistic regression models determined the probability of reducing weight and systolic BP (SBP).
Results:
NUT group decreased weight [-1.3 (3.1) kg; P < 0.0001] and WC [-3.0 (3.8) cm; P < 0.0001] to a greater extent than CONTROL [weight: -0.4 (3.1) kg; P = 0.51; WC: -1.4 (4.5) cm; P = 0.02]. In CONTROL, 7% reduced ≥ 5% weight and 31% reduced ≥ 10 mmHg SBP, whereas, in the NUT group, 18% reduced ≥ 5% weight and 47% reduced ≥ 10 mmHg SBP. Patients in NUT (versus CONTROL) were more likely to lose ≥ 5% of weight (odds ratio = 4.27, 95% confidence interval = 1.69-10.80; P < 0.01) and reduce SBP ≥ 10 mmHg (odds ratio = 3.15, 95% confidence interval = 1.58-6.27; P < 0.01).
Conclusions:
Patients who received nutritional counselling during CR improved anthropometric measures and were more likely to lose weight and reduce SBP than patients without nutritional counselling.
Related Concept Videos
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Factors affecting Blood pressure
Physiological Factors:
Hypertension III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Hypertension V: Nursing Management
Special considerations while measuring blood pressure
Monitoring Both Arms:
Monitoring BP in both arms during the initial assessment is advisable, as the systolic value may differ by five to ten mm Hg between arms. For subsequent BP assessments, use the arm with the higher reading.

