Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 4, 2025

Lumped-Parameter and Finite Element Modeling of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction
Published on: February 13, 2021
Flexible or rigid ring in mitral annuloplasty-do the results differ?
Varghese Thomas Panicker1, Renjith Sreekantan1, Sai Suraj Kotera1
1Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Sree Chitra Tirunal Institute for Medical Sciences and Technology, Trivandrum, 695011 India.
The choice between rigid and flexible rings for mitral valve annuloplasty showed no significant difference in outcomes at 5-year follow-up. Mitral regurgitation progression was similar in both groups, indicating ring type does not impact midterm results.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Cardiac Surgery
- Medical Devices
Background:
- Mitral valve repair is preferred over replacement for severe primary mitral regurgitation, offering restored life expectancy and avoiding lifelong anticoagulation.
- The selection of rigid versus flexible annuloplasty rings remains a subject of debate, often based on surgeon preference.
- Carpentier's contributions significantly advanced mitral valve annuloplasty techniques over the decades.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the midterm outcomes of mitral valve annuloplasty using flexible versus rigid annuloplasty rings.
- To assess the impact of ring type on left ventricular size regression and the recurrence of mitral regurgitation.
- To evaluate the efficacy of mitral valve repair in patients with severe primary mitral regurgitation.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective study of 112 patients undergoing mitral valve annuloplasty between 2010 and 2014.
- Comparison of outcomes between patients who received rigid rings and those who received flexible rings.
- 5-year follow-up to assess left ventricular (LV) size and mitral regurgitation (MR) progression.
Main Results:
- No significant difference in mitral regurgitation progression was observed between the rigid and flexible ring groups at 5-year follow-up.
- Left ventricular size regression (LVIDD and LVIDS) showed no statistically significant difference between the two groups.
- Only three patients experienced significant mitral regurgitation (3+ MR) at follow-up, with similar distribution between groups.
Conclusions:
- The choice of rigid or flexible annuloplasty ring does not appear to significantly impact the midterm outcomes of mitral valve annuloplasty.
- Both ring types demonstrated comparable efficacy in preventing mitral regurgitation progression and facilitating left ventricular remodeling.
- Further research may explore long-term outcomes and specific patient factors influencing ring selection.
More Related Videos
08:20A Reliable and Reproducible Critical-Sized Segmental Femoral Defect Model in Rats Stabilized with a Custom External Fixator
Published on: March 24, 2019
08:49Author Spotlight: Enhancing Graft Viability Assessment Through Quantitative Metrics and Innovative Reservoir Systems
Published on: August 2, 2024