Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 3, 2025

Utilizing a 3D Printed Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication Model to Shorten a Resident's Learning Curve
Published on: August 15, 2025
An Evaluation of the Surgical Foundations Curriculum: A National Study
Ekaterina Kouzmina1, Stephen Mann1, Timothy Chaplin2
1Department of Surgery, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Background:
Canadian Surgical Foundations (SF) residency programs transitioned to competency-based medical education in 2018. It is unknown how well the SF curriculum prepares surgery residents to recognize and manage common perioperative patient presentations. We sought to evaluate the national SF curriculum using the Kirkpatrick model of curriculum evaluation.
Methods:
We administered online surveys to 300 first-year English-speaking surgery residents across Canada to assess self-reported confidence in recognizing and managing 7 common perioperative patient presentations at 3 timepoints: pre-SF (July 2019), mid-SF (December 2019), and post-SF (May 2020). We conducted multistation simulation-based objective structured clinical examinations for surgery residents at our institution pre-SF (August 2019) and mid-SF (December 2019), and collected workplace-based assessment (WBA) data, including entrustment scores and narrative feedback, for 6 preselected entrustable professional activities (EPAs) (July 2019 to May 2020).
Results:
Fifty-five residents (18%) completed pre-SF, 31 (10%) completed mid-SF, and 52 (17%) completed post-SF surveys. Residents' confidence in recognizing 6 out of 7 patient presentations was high pre-SF and did not improve significantly during the SF curriculum except for recognizing poor glycemic control (p < 0.01). Residents' confidence in managing 7 out of 7 patient presentations improved significantly (p < 0.05). Objective structured clinical examinations performance did not change significantly between pre-SF and mid-SF (4 [3.5-4.5] vs 4 [3-4]; p = 0.28). Analysis of WBA data showed that residents received high entrustment scores from the start of the SF curriculum. Entrustment scores improved significantly during the SF curriculum for 2 out of 6 EPAs. Only 56% of WBA assessments had narrative feedback, 16% of which had somewhat constructive feedback.
Conclusion:
Participation in the SF curriculum was associated with improved confidence of surgery residents in managing common perioperative patient presentations, and greater level of entrustment for some EPAs. Consideration should be given to further faculty development to increase the quantity and quality of narrative feedback in the SF curriculum.
Related Concept Videos
Nursing Evaluation
Theoretical Foundations of Nursing Practice
Theories provide a perspective to assess patients' conditions and organize data and methods. They also assist in analyzing and interpreting information. They represent a...
Urinary Tract Calculi VI: Surgical Management
Inflammatory Bowel Disease V: Surgical Management
Here are some common surgical interventions for IBD:

