Understanding Covalent versus Spin-Orbit Coupling Contributions to Temperature-Dependent Electron Spin Relaxation in
Alec H Follmer1, Ryan D Ribson1, Paul H Oyala1
1Division of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Arthur Amos Noyes Laboratory of Chemical Physics, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125, United States.
Abstract:
Recent interest in transition-metal complexes as potential quantum bits (qubits) has reinvigorated the investigation of fundamental contributions to electron spin relaxation in various ligand scaffolds. From quantum computers to chemical and biological sensors, interest in leveraging the quantum properties of these molecules has opened a discussion of the requirements to maintain coherence over a large temperature range, including near room temperature. Here we compare temperature-, magnetic field position-, and concentration-dependent electron spin relaxation in copper(II) phthalocyanine (CuPc) and vanadyl phthalocyanine (VOPc) doped into diamagnetic hosts. While VOPc demonstrates coherence up to room temperature, CuPc coherence times become rapidly T1-limited with increasing temperature, despite featuring a more covalent ground-state wave function than VOPc. As rationalized by a ligand field model, this difference is ascribed to different spin-orbit coupling (SOC) constants for Cu(II) versus V(IV). The manifestation of SOC contributions to spin-phonon coupling and electron spin relaxation in different ligand fields is discussed, allowing for a further understanding of the competing roles of SOC and covalency in electron spin relaxation.
More Related Videos
![Measuring the Spin-Lattice Relaxation Magnetic Field Dependence of Hyperpolarized [1-13C]pyruvate](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcloudfront.jove.com%2FCDNSource%2Fteasers%2F59399.jpg&w=3840&q=50)
Related Concept Videos
01:22Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the involved orbitals. The...
02:42Valence Bond Theory
03:02Colors and Magnetism
When atoms or molecules absorb light at the proper frequency, their electrons are excited to higher-energy orbitals. For many main group atoms and molecules, the absorbed photons are in the ultraviolet range of the electromagnetic spectrum, which cannot be detected by the human eye. For coordination compounds, the energy difference between the d orbitals often allows photons in the visible range to be absorbed and emitted, which is seen as colors by the human...
01:27Atomic Spectroscopy: Effects of Temperature
At thermal equilibrium, the relative populations of excited and ground state atoms can be estimated using the Maxwell–Boltzmann distribution. For example, an increase in temperature...
01:08Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must...
02:58Crystal Field Theory - Octahedral Complexes
To explain the observed behavior of transition metal complexes (such as colors), a model involving electrostatic interactions between the electrons from the ligands and the electrons in the unhybridized d orbitals of the central metal atom has been developed. This electrostatic model is crystal field theory (CFT). It helps to understand, interpret, and predict the colors, magnetic behavior, and some structures of coordination compounds of transition metals.
CFT focuses on...