Related Experiment Videos
Hysteria: its nature and explanation.
1Department of Clinical Psychology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK.
The British Journal of Clinical Psychology
|September 1, 1987
Summary
Hysteria research faces confusion. The illness behavior/sick role model offers a valuable framework for experimental investigation, avoiding logical pitfalls of other theories.
Area of Science:
- Psychology
- Medical Humanities
- Sociology of Health
Background:
- Hysteria is a historically complex and controversial concept.
- Existing theories of hysteria present significant theoretical and empirical challenges.
- A need exists to clarify the phenomenon and its explanatory models.
Purpose of the Study:
- To critically evaluate contemporary approaches to understanding hysteria.
- To propose a more experimentally tractable model for hysteria research.
- To identify a framework that avoids logical inconsistencies.
Main Methods:
- Review and critique of current theoretical models of hysteria.
- Comparative analysis of explanatory frameworks.
- Conceptualization of the illness behavior/sick role model for hysteria.
Main Results:
- Contemporary hysteria theories exhibit substantial weaknesses.
- The illness behavior/sick role model provides heuristic value.
- This model facilitates novel research questions amenable to experimentation.
Conclusions:
- The illness behavior/sick role model offers a promising avenue for advancing hysteria research.
- This approach circumvents the logical difficulties present in alternative theories.
- Further experimental investigation using this model is warranted.