Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Maximum performance tests of speech production.

R D Kent1, J F Kent, J C Rosenbek

  • 1University of Wisconsin-Madison.

The Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders
|November 1, 1987
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Perceptuo-acoustic assessment of prosodic impairment in dysarthria.

Clinical linguistics & phonetics·2011
Same author

Aspiration and swallowing in Parkinson disease and rehabilitation with EMST: a randomized trial.

Neurology·2010
Same author

Studies in complement fixation; spectrophotometric titration of complement; construction of graphs for direct determination of the 50 per cent hemolytic unit.

Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950)·2010
Same author

Studies in complement fixation; preservation of sheep's blood in citrate dextrose mixtures (modified Alsever's solution) for use in the complement fixation reaction.

The Journal of laboratory and clinical medicine·2010
Same author

The serodiagnosis of amebiasis.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2010
Same author

The serodiagnosis of amebiasis; evaluation of the currently available antigens in a quantitatively standardized complement-fixation test.

The American journal of pathology·2010
Same journal

Comment on "Methodological variables affecting phonational frequency range in adults".

The Journal of speech and hearing disorders·1990
Same journal

Comment on "Concomitant speech and language disorders in stuttering children: a critique of the literature".

The Journal of speech and hearing disorders·1990
Same journal

The Iowa Articulation Norms Project and its Nebraska replication.

The Journal of speech and hearing disorders·1990
Same journal

Normative data in quiet, broadband noise, and competing message for Northwestern University Auditory Test No. 6 by a female speaker.

The Journal of speech and hearing disorders·1990
Same journal

A sindscal analysis of perceptual features for consonants produced by esophageal and tracheoesophageal talkers.

The Journal of speech and hearing disorders·1990
Same journal

Patient compliance with cleft palate team regimens.

The Journal of speech and hearing disorders·1990
See all related articles

This study reviews maximum performance tests for speech production, like maximum phonation duration and diadochokinetic rate. It summarizes normative data to improve clinical interpretation of these speech assessment tasks.

Area of Science:

  • Speech-Language Pathology
  • Clinical Linguistics
  • Speech Motor Control

Background:

  • Maximum performance tests assess the upper limits of speech production capabilities.
  • Common tests include maximum phonation duration, expiratory pressure, and diadochokinetic rate.
  • These tests are crucial in speech disorder assessments, analogous to neurological strength tests.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To consolidate and review published normative data for maximum performance speech tests.
  • To evaluate the adequacy of existing data for clinical application.
  • To provide interpretive guidelines for enhancing the clinical utility of these tests.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic review of published literature on maximum performance speech tests.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Compilation and summary of normative data across various speech tasks.
  • Analysis of data adequacy and development of interpretive recommendations.

    • Main Results:

    • Normative data for maximum performance tests are scattered across the literature.
    • Existing data show variability, impacting direct clinical application.
    • Guidelines are proposed to standardize interpretation and improve clinical decision-making.

    Conclusions:

    • Maximum performance tests are valuable clinical tools for speech assessment.
    • A comprehensive review and interpretive guidelines are needed due to data variability.
    • Standardized interpretation will enhance the diagnostic and therapeutic value of these speech tests.