Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 3, 2025

Guidelines and Experience Using Imaging Biomarker Explorer IBEX for Radiomics
Published on: January 8, 2018
The structural similarity index for IMRT quality assurance: radiomics-based error classification
Chaoqiong Ma1, Ruoxi Wang1, Shun Zhou1
1Key laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, 100142, China.
This study introduces a machine learning (ML) approach using radiomics on Structural SIMilarity (SSIM) sub-index maps for improved error detection in intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) quality assurance (QA). The ML model significantly outperforms conventional gamma analysis in identifying delivery errors.
Area of Science:
- Medical Physics
- Radiotherapy Technology
- Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Background:
- Conventional gamma analysis in intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) quality assurance (QA) has limitations in accurately identifying delivery errors.
- Radiomics and machine learning (ML) show promise for enhancing error detection in IMRT QA.
- Structural SIMilarity (SSIM) sub-index maps can reveal specific types of dose distribution errors.
Purpose of the Study:
- To apply radiomics analysis on SSIM sub-index maps for feature extraction.
- To develop and validate ML models for classifying machine-related delivery errors in patient-specific dynamic IMRT QA.
- To compare the performance of the ML-based method against conventional gamma analysis.
Main Methods:
- Simulated four types of machine-related errors (MU variations, MLC shifts, random MLC mispositioning) in 21 IMRT plans.
- Acquired 1620 portal dose images and calculated difference maps, including SSIM sub-index maps.
- Extracted radiomic features, employed SVM recursive feature elimination for feature selection, and tested classifiers (LDC, SVM, RF) using nested cross-validation.
Main Results:
- The Linear-SVM model achieved the highest overall classification accuracy of 0.86.
- Average classification accuracies for shift, opening, and random errors were approximately 0.9.
- The ML model demonstrated superior performance compared to gamma analysis (2 mm/2% criterion), with higher sensitivity to errors.
Conclusions:
- An ML-based method utilizing radiomics on SSIM sub-index maps effectively identifies machine-related errors in dynamic IMRT QA.
- The developed ML models achieved high classification accuracies, surpassing conventional gamma analysis.
- This radiomics and ML approach holds significant potential for improving error detection in patient-specific IMRT QA.

