Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Language and Cognition

Language and Cognition

Language serves as a bridge between ideas and communication, influencing how individuals perceive and interact with the world. Psychologists have long debated whether language shapes thought or vice versa. This discussion gained grip with Edward Sapir and Benjamin Lee Whorf in the 1940s, who proposed that language determines thought, a concept known as linguistic determinism. They suggested that the vocabulary and structure of a language influence how its speakers think and perceive reality.

Learning Disabilities

Learning Disabilities

Learning disabilities are cognitive disorders caused by neurological impairments that affect cognitive functions like language and reading, without indicating overall intellectual or developmental challenges. These disabilities differ from global intellectual or developmental disabilities as they are limited to distinct cognitive functions. Common learning disabilities include dysgraphia, dyslexia, and dyscalculia, each of which impacts unique aspects of learning.
Dyslexia
Dyslexia is a...

Language Development

Language Development

Children master language quickly and with relative ease, supported by both biological predisposition and reinforcement. B. F. Skinner (1957) proposed that language is learned through reinforcement, while Noam Chomsky (1965) argued that language acquisition mechanisms are biologically determined.
The critical period for language acquisition suggests that the ability to acquire language is at its peak early in life. As people age, this proficiency decreases. Language development begins very...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Author Correction: The balance between stability and plasticity of the visual word form area in dyslexia.

Nature communications·2026

Same author

A fair lexical decision task for monolingual and multilingual Spanish-speakers.

Frontiers in psychology·2026

Same author

Neonatal brain-age models in full- and preterm infants.

Developmental cognitive neuroscience·2026

Same author

Loudness changes as a function of the audiovisual scene.

Scientific reports·2026

Same author

Improving validity and efficiency of digital dyslexia screening through trial-by-trial feedback.

Psychological assessment·2026

Same author

Visual processing is a language-agnostic window into heterogeneity in early reading development.

Current biology : CB·2026

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 2, 2025

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education

Published on: August 16, 2024

Context effects on phoneme categorization in children with dyslexia.

Gabrielle E O'Brien¹, Liesbeth Gijbels¹, Jason D Yeatman²

¹Institute for Learning and Brain Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98105, USA.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

|November 3, 2020

Summary

Children with dyslexia show differences in phoneme categorization tasks. This study found these differences are not due to task design, neural encoding, or executive function, suggesting a broader linguistic development link to literacy.

More Related Videos

Assessing Dyslexia at Six Year of Age

Assessing Dyslexia at Six Year of Age

Published on: May 1, 2020

Defining the Role Of Language in Infants' Object Categorization with Eye-tracking Paradigms

Defining the Role Of Language in Infants' Object Categorization with Eye-tracking Paradigms

Published on: February 8, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 2, 2025

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education

Published on: August 16, 2024

Assessing Dyslexia at Six Year of Age

Assessing Dyslexia at Six Year of Age

Published on: May 1, 2020

Defining the Role Of Language in Infants' Object Categorization with Eye-tracking Paradigms

Defining the Role Of Language in Infants' Object Categorization with Eye-tracking Paradigms

Published on: February 8, 2019

Area of Science:

Psycholinguistics
Developmental Psychology
Cognitive Neuroscience

Background:

Children with dyslexia often exhibit less categorical behavior in phoneme categorization tasks.
Subtle task-related factors might explain these observed differences in struggling readers.
Investigating these factors is crucial for understanding the underlying mechanisms of dyslexia.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate subtle differences in phoneme categorization between children with dyslexia and typically developing peers.
To examine sensitivity to stimulus frequency distribution, presentation bias, and task fatigue.
To determine if these factors contribute to the observed differences in categorical labeling.

Main Methods:

Replication of previous findings on reading skill and categorical labeling.
Analysis of sensitivity to stimulus frequency distributions.
Assessment of bias from previous stimuli and task engagement/fatigue.

Main Results:

Reading skill was confirmed to be related to categorical labeling.
No significant differences were found in sensitivity to frequency distribution between groups.
No evidence of differing stimulus bias or fatigue effects was observed.

Conclusions:

The relationship between reading skill and categorical labeling is unlikely due to task design artifacts, neural encoding, or executive function.
These findings suggest categorical labeling may reflect a general linguistic development feature.
Further research is needed to ascertain the causal relationship between categorical labeling and literacy acquisition.