Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Working Memory01:24

Working Memory

614
Working memory refers to a combination of components, including short-term memory and attention, that allow an individual to hold information temporarily as we perform cognitive tasks. It is an essential cognitive function that enables the execution of complex tasks such as problem-solving, comprehension, and reasoning. Unlike short-term memory, which simply involves the storage of information for a brief period, working memory involves the active manipulation and processing of this...
614
Role of Cerebellum and Prefrontal Cortex in Memory01:14

Role of Cerebellum and Prefrontal Cortex in Memory

825
The cerebellum, while traditionally associated with motor control, also plays a crucial role in memory, particularly in procedural memory, which involves learning motor tasks that become automatic through repetition. For example, studies have shown that when the cerebellum is damaged, individuals or animals lose the ability to learn conditioned motor responses, such as the conditioned eye-blink response in classical conditioning experiments with rabbits. This study demonstrates the...
825

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Accelerated long-term forgetting in Alzheimer's disease continuum: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD·2026
Same author

How the brain judges harm: functional networks among intentional and accidental moral evaluation.

Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience·2026
Same author

Work-Related Stress and Glucose Regulation in Air Traffic Control Officers: Implications for Medical Certification.

Biomedicines·2025
Same author

Comparing Immersive and Non-Immersive VR: Effects on Spatial Learning and Aesthetic Experience in Museum Settings.

Brain sciences·2025
Same author

How does reasoning influence intentionality attribution in the case of side effects?

Cognitive processing·2025
Same author

Field dependent-independent cognitive style as a predictor of malevolent creativity: a multifaceted approach.

Frontiers in psychology·2025
Same journal

Anterior Cingulate Cortex Mediates State-Dependent Prioritization of Distressed Conspecifics.

Brain sciences·2026
Same journal

Hemispherotomy for Pediatric Post-Traumatic Epilepsy.

Brain sciences·2026
Same journal

When Robots Learn: Artificial Intelligence and the Next Human-Centered Era of Neurorehabilitation.

Brain sciences·2026
Same journal

The Association Between Changes in White Matter Microstructure and Cognitive Function in Older Adults with Mild Cognitive Impairment.

Brain sciences·2026
Same journal

Beyond Ventricular Enlargement: Multimodal MRI Assessment Improves Surgical Decision-Making in Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus.

Brain sciences·2026
Same journal

The Effects of Personalized Observation, Execution, and Mental Imagery (POEM) Therapy in Logopenic Primary Progressive Aphasia: A Telepractice-Based Single-Case Study.

Brain sciences·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 2, 2025

Measuring the Switch Cost of Smartphone Use While Walking
07:00

Measuring the Switch Cost of Smartphone Use While Walking

Published on: April 30, 2020

2.1K

Chatting While Walking Does Not Interfere with Topographical Working Memory.

Laura Piccardi1,2, Alessia Bocchi1,2, Massimiliano Palmiero3

  • 1Department of Psychology, "Sapienza" University of Rome, 00185 Rome, RM, Italy.

Brain Sciences
|November 5, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Spatial language does not significantly impact topographical working memory during navigation. Environmental interference, however, does affect performance, suggesting language is more crucial for learning and recalling cognitive maps.

Keywords:
frame of referencegenderinterferencenavigationorientationspatialworking memory

More Related Videos

Reversible Cooling-induced Deactivations to Study Cortical Contributions to Obstacle Memory in the Walking Cat
09:43

Reversible Cooling-induced Deactivations to Study Cortical Contributions to Obstacle Memory in the Walking Cat

Published on: December 11, 2017

7.2K
Author Spotlight: Investigating the Effects of Mind-Body-Movement Practices on Brain Function
06:17

Author Spotlight: Investigating the Effects of Mind-Body-Movement Practices on Brain Function

Published on: January 26, 2024

2.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 2, 2025

Measuring the Switch Cost of Smartphone Use While Walking
07:00

Measuring the Switch Cost of Smartphone Use While Walking

Published on: April 30, 2020

2.1K
Reversible Cooling-induced Deactivations to Study Cortical Contributions to Obstacle Memory in the Walking Cat
09:43

Reversible Cooling-induced Deactivations to Study Cortical Contributions to Obstacle Memory in the Walking Cat

Published on: December 11, 2017

7.2K
Author Spotlight: Investigating the Effects of Mind-Body-Movement Practices on Brain Function
06:17

Author Spotlight: Investigating the Effects of Mind-Body-Movement Practices on Brain Function

Published on: January 26, 2024

2.4K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Human Navigation

Background:

  • Topographical working memory is essential for effective navigation.
  • The role of language, particularly spatial language, in influencing navigational working memory remains an area of active research.
  • Understanding interference effects is key to elucidating the mechanisms of spatial memory.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the influence of verbal and spatial language interference on landmark-based topographical working memory.
  • To compare the impact of spatial language interference against other interference types (verbal, motor, spatial-motor).
  • To determine if spatial language significantly interferes with online navigational working memory tasks.

Main Methods:

  • Employed the dual task technique across three experiments.
  • Introduced different verbal interference tasks: articulatory suppression of nonsense syllables, directional words (right/left, up/bottom), and cardinal directions (north/south/east/west).
  • Assessed topographical working memory performance under various interference conditions, including spatial environmental interference.

Main Results:

  • Spatial language interference did not significantly affect topographical working memory performance.
  • Spatial environmental interference demonstrably impacted navigational working memory.
  • No significant difference was found between spatial language interference and other verbal interference types.

Conclusions:

  • Spatial language appears to play a limited role in online navigational working memory tasks.
  • Language's primary contribution may lie in the learning and retrieval phases of cognitive map formation.
  • Environmental factors exert a more direct influence on immediate navigational working memory than spatial language.