Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 2, 2025

Assessing Binocular Central Visual Field and Binocular Eye Movements in a Dichoptic Viewing Condition
07:45

Assessing Binocular Central Visual Field and Binocular Eye Movements in a Dichoptic Viewing Condition

Published on: July 21, 2020

4.8K

Visual Search Within a Limited Window Area: Scrolling Versus Moving Window.

Yumiko Fujii1, Hiromi Morita1

  • 1Faculty of Library, Information, and Media Science, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.

I-Perception
|November 5, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision01:15

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision

1.5K
Depth perception is the ability to perceive objects three-dimensionally. It relies on two types of cues: binocular and monocular. Binocular cues depend on the combination of images from both eyes and how the eyes work together. Since the eyes are in slightly different positions, each eye captures a slightly different image. This disparity between images, known as binocular disparity, helps the brain interpret depth. When the brain compares these images, it determines the distance to an object.
1.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Encoding of object location in a scrolling display.

i-Perception·2024
Same journal

Pseudo-slimy: A novel phenomenon to evoke stickiness perception.

i-Perception·2026
Same journal

Predictive visual uncertainty around moving trajectories influences causality judgments in launching displays.

i-Perception·2026
Same journal

Light and shape in the work of Robert Fones.

i-Perception·2026
Same journal

Sensorimotor numerosity uniquely supports arithmetic development in children.

i-Perception·2026
Same journal

In praise of anaglyphs.

i-Perception·2026
Same journal

Is number a primary perceptual attribute?

i-Perception·2026
See all related articles

Image scrolling on mobile devices is less efficient for visual search than using a moving window. This study found scrolling led to slower perception and different eye movement patterns compared to other viewing methods.

Area of Science:

  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Visual Perception

Background:

  • Limited screen space on mobile devices necessitates image viewing techniques like scrolling.
  • Understanding visual perception during image scrolling is crucial for optimizing user experience.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate visual perception and search efficiency within a small window frame.
  • To compare visual search efficiency across scrolling, moving-window, and free-viewing modes.

Main Methods:

  • Compared visual search efficiency using three modes: scrolling, moving-window, and free-viewing.
  • Varied item number and stimulus size to assess impact on search performance.
  • Analyzed scan traces to understand eye movement patterns.
Keywords:
eye movementsimage scrollingoculomotor behaviortracking/shifting attentionvisual perceptionvisual search

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Assessment of Visual Acuity in Central Vision Loss Through Motion-Based Peripheral Vision Testing
06:25

Author Spotlight: Assessment of Visual Acuity in Central Vision Loss Through Motion-Based Peripheral Vision Testing

Published on: February 23, 2024

917
Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss
07:12

Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Published on: April 11, 2025

738

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 2, 2025

Assessing Binocular Central Visual Field and Binocular Eye Movements in a Dichoptic Viewing Condition
07:45

Assessing Binocular Central Visual Field and Binocular Eye Movements in a Dichoptic Viewing Condition

Published on: July 21, 2020

4.8K
Author Spotlight: Assessment of Visual Acuity in Central Vision Loss Through Motion-Based Peripheral Vision Testing
06:25

Author Spotlight: Assessment of Visual Acuity in Central Vision Loss Through Motion-Based Peripheral Vision Testing

Published on: February 23, 2024

917
Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss
07:12

Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Published on: April 11, 2025

738

Main Results:

  • Search efficiency varied significantly by mode: scrolling was slowest, followed by moving-window, with free-viewing being fastest.
  • Scrolling showed the slowest increase in response time relative to stimulus size.
  • Scan traces revealed frequent pauses and small shifts for scrolling, contrasting with continuous movements for the moving-window.

Conclusions:

  • Image scrolling is less efficient for visual search than a moving-window approach.
  • Differences in scan dynamics, including pauses and movement patterns, underlie the observed efficiency variations.