Comparison of MultiLocus Sequence Typing (MLST) and Microsatellite Length Polymorphism (MLP) for Pneumocystis
Maud Gits-Muselli1,2,3, Pascal Campagne4, Marie Desnos-Ollivier3
1Laboratoire de Parasitologie-Mycologie; AP-HP, Groupe Hospitalier Saint-Louis-Lariboisière-Fernand-Widal, Paris, France.
Abstract:
Pneumocystis jirovecii is an atypical fungus responsible for severe respiratory infections, often reported as local outbreaks in immunocompromised patients. Epidemiology of this infection, and transmission risk emphasises the need for developing genotyping techniques. Currently, two methods have emerged: Multilocus Sequence typing (MLST) and microsatellite length polymorphism (MLP). Here we compare an MLST strategy, including 2 nuclear loci and 2 mitochondrial loci, with an MLP strategy including 6 nuclear markers using 37 clinical PCR-positive respiratory samples from two French hospitals. Pneumocystis jirovecii MLST and MLP provided 30 and 35 different genotypes respectively. A higher number of mixed infections was detected using MLP (48.6% vs. 13.5% respectively; p = 0.002). Only one MLP marker (STR279) was statistically associated with the geographical origin of samples. Haplotype network inferred using the available genotypes yielded expanded network for MLP, characterized by more mutational steps as compared to MLST, suggesting that the MLP approach is more resolutive to separate genotypes. The correlation between genetic distances calculated based on MLST and MLP was modest with a R 2 value = 0.32 (p < 0.001). Finally, both genotyping methods fulfilled important criteria: (i) a discriminatory power from 97.5% to 99.5% and (ii) being quick and convenient genotyping tools. While MLP appeared highly resolutive regarding genotypes mixture within samples, using one genotyping method rather than the other may also depend on the context (i.e., MLST for investigation of suspected clonal outbreaks versus MLP for population structure study) as well as local facilities.
Insights
Microsatellite length polymorphism (MLP) offers higher resolution than Multilocus Sequence typing (MLST) for Pneumocystis jirovecii genotyping, detecting more mixed infections and genotypes. MLP is valuable for population studies, while MLST suits clonal outbreak investigations.
Area of Science:
- Medical Mycology
- Molecular Epidemiology
- Infectious Diseases
Background:
- Pneumocystis jirovecii causes severe respiratory infections in immunocompromised individuals.
- Understanding transmission requires effective genotyping techniques.
- Multilocus Sequence typing (MLST) and microsatellite length polymorphism (MLP) are emerging methods.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the discriminatory power and resolution of MLST and MLP for Pneumocystis jirovecii genotyping.
- To evaluate the ability of each method to detect mixed infections and population structure.
Main Methods:
- Compared an MLST strategy (2 nuclear, 2 mitochondrial loci) with an MLP strategy (6 nuclear markers).
- Analyzed 37 clinical respiratory samples from two French hospitals.
- Inferred haplotype networks and calculated genetic distances.
Main Results:
- MLP identified more genotypes (35) than MLST (30).
- MLP detected significantly more mixed infections (48.6% vs. 13.5%; p=0.002).
- MLP provided a more resolved haplotype network, indicating higher resolution.
Conclusions:
- Both MLST and MLP are discriminatory (97.5%-99.5%) and convenient genotyping tools.
- MLP is more resolutive for detecting genotype mixtures and population structure.
- Method choice depends on the epidemiological context: MLST for clonal outbreaks, MLP for population studies.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Modern Molecular Taxonomy
Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons


