Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test01:00

Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test

6.7K
When one or more data points appear far from the rest of the data, there is a need to determine whether they are outliers and whether they should be eliminated from the data set to ensure an accurate representation of the measured value. In many cases, outliers arise from gross errors (or human errors) and do not accurately reflect the underlying phenomenon. In some cases, however, these apparent outliers reflect true phenomenological differences. In these cases, we can use statistical methods...
6.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Presurgical magnetoencephalography-derived network control metrics distinguish successful hippocampal resection vs sparing in temporal lobe epilepsy.

Epilepsia·2026
Same author

Magnetoencephalography in Epilepsy: Role and Principles.

Neuroimaging clinics of North America·2026
Same author

Magnetoencephalography studies in migraine and headache disorders: A systematic review.

Headache·2024
Same author

Machine learning algorithm for predicting seizure control after temporal lobe resection using peri-ictal electroencephalography.

Scientific reports·2024
Same author

Role of optically pumped magnetometers in presurgical epilepsy evaluation: Commentary of the American Clinical Magnetoencephalography Society.

Epilepsia·2023
Same author

Clinical significance of ictal magnetoencephalography in patients undergoing epilepsy surgery.

Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology·2022
Same journal

The Physics and Physiology of Electrical Stimulation of the Brain.

Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society·2026
Same journal

Neurophysiology in Postanoxic Encephalopathy: Pathophysiology, Prognosis, and Treatment.

Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society·2026
Same journal

A Review on the Functional Connectivity of the Human Opercular Cortex.

Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society·2026
Same journal

Surgical Aspects of Opercular Epilepsies.

Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society·2026
Same journal

Cost-Effectiveness of EEG Monitoring in Hypoxic-Ischemic Brain Injury After Cardiac Arrest.

Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society·2026
Same journal

Pathophysiology and Prognostic Significance of Myoclonus in Hypoxic-Ischemic Encephalopathy.

Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 1, 2025

Equipment Setup and Artifact Removal for Simultaneous Electroencephalogram and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Clinical Review in Epilepsy
10:23

Equipment Setup and Artifact Removal for Simultaneous Electroencephalogram and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Clinical Review in Epilepsy

Published on: June 23, 2023

2.4K

Recognizing and Correcting MEG Artifacts.

Richard C Burgess1

  • 1Cleveland Clinic Epilepsy Center, Cleveland, Ohio, U.S.A.

Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology : Official Publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society
|November 9, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Magnetoencephalography (MEG) artifacts stem from various internal and external sources, including environmental interference and patient-related activity. Effective reduction strategies involve shielded rooms, differential sensors, active compensation, and advanced filtering techniques.

More Related Videos

Protocol for the Evaluation of MRI Artifacts Caused by Metal Implants to Assess the Suitability of Implants and the Vulnerability of Pulse Sequences
08:19

Protocol for the Evaluation of MRI Artifacts Caused by Metal Implants to Assess the Suitability of Implants and the Vulnerability of Pulse Sequences

Published on: May 17, 2018

10.2K
Conscious and Non-conscious Representations of Emotional Faces in Asperger's Syndrome
08:31

Conscious and Non-conscious Representations of Emotional Faces in Asperger's Syndrome

Published on: July 31, 2016

14.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 1, 2025

Equipment Setup and Artifact Removal for Simultaneous Electroencephalogram and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Clinical Review in Epilepsy
10:23

Equipment Setup and Artifact Removal for Simultaneous Electroencephalogram and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Clinical Review in Epilepsy

Published on: June 23, 2023

2.4K
Protocol for the Evaluation of MRI Artifacts Caused by Metal Implants to Assess the Suitability of Implants and the Vulnerability of Pulse Sequences
08:19

Protocol for the Evaluation of MRI Artifacts Caused by Metal Implants to Assess the Suitability of Implants and the Vulnerability of Pulse Sequences

Published on: May 17, 2018

10.2K
Conscious and Non-conscious Representations of Emotional Faces in Asperger's Syndrome
08:31

Conscious and Non-conscious Representations of Emotional Faces in Asperger's Syndrome

Published on: July 31, 2016

14.2K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroimaging
  • Biophysics
  • Biomedical Engineering

Background:

  • Magnetoencephalography (MEG) is a neuroimaging technique that measures magnetic fields produced by brain activity.
  • Accurate interpretation of MEG data relies on minimizing noise and artifacts.
  • Understanding artifact sources is crucial for reliable MEG recordings.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To comprehensively review and categorize noise sources and artifacts in magnetoencephalography (MEG).
  • To discuss methods for reducing or eliminating magnetic interference and artifacts.
  • To highlight similarities and differences between MEG and electroencephalography (EEG) artifacts.

Main Methods:

  • Identification and classification of 11 distinct categories of MEG artifacts.
  • Description of common noise sources, including external interference, physiological signals, and equipment-related issues.
  • Review of established techniques for artifact reduction, such as shielded rooms, gradiometers, active compensation, and postprocessing filters.

Main Results:

  • MEG artifacts originate from external interference, internal physiological/non-physiological sources, sensor noise, and procedural factors.
  • Key mitigation strategies include shielded environments, differential sensors, active noise cancellation, and advanced signal processing.
  • While some artifacts overlap with EEG, many are unique to MEG, requiring specific attention.

Conclusions:

  • MEG recordings are susceptible to a wide range of artifacts that can impact data quality and interpretation.
  • A combination of technical solutions and careful procedural management is necessary to minimize artifacts.
  • Knowledge of EEG artifacts can be partially transferable, but distinct MEG artifact characteristics must be addressed.