Simple method to extend the range of ECO-BB for waters with high backscattering coefficient
Applied Optics
|November 11, 2020
Summary
A new method extends the range of the ECO-BB (Sea Bird Scientific) instrument for measuring water backscattering. Using a nephelometric turbidimeter, this approach accurately quantifies backscattering in turbid inland and coastal waters.
Area of Science:
- Ocean optics
- Water quality monitoring
- In-situ optical measurements
Background:
- The ECO-BB instrument is widely used for measuring the backscattering coefficient in water optics research.
- Standard ECO-BB calibration is optimized for low backscattering in oceanic waters.
- High particle concentrations in inland and coastal waters can cause ECO-BB saturation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To present a simple method for extending the measurement range of the ECO-BB instrument in turbid waters.
- To validate the use of a nephelometric turbidimeter as a proxy for backscattering measurements in high turbidity environments.
Main Methods:
- The method involves using a nephelometric turbidimeter in conjunction with the ECO-BB instrument.
- Tests were conducted using powdered calcium carbonate in freshwater.
- Field validation was performed using water samples from the Singapore Straits and the Lupar River.
Main Results:
- A strong correlation was observed between ECO-BB and turbidimeter measurements across all tests.
- The nephelometric turbidimeter proved effective in measuring backscattering in highly turbid water samples.
- The proposed method successfully extends the utility of the ECO-BB in challenging aquatic environments.
Conclusions:
- A nephelometric turbidimeter can serve as a reliable proxy for backscattering coefficient measurements in turbid waters.
- This method enhances the applicability of the ECO-BB instrument for water optics research in diverse aquatic systems.
- The findings support improved water quality assessment in coastal and inland environments.
Related Concept Videos
Bioremediation
21.8K
Bioremediation is the use of prokaryotes, fungi, or plants to remove pollutants from the environment. This process has been used to remove harmful toxins in groundwater as a byproduct of agricultural run-off and also to clean up oil spills.
21.8K
Echo
738
The human ear cannot distinguish between two sources of sound if they happen to reach within a specific time interval, typically 0.1 seconds apart. More than this, and they are perceived as separate sources.
Imagine the sound is reflected back to the ears. Assuming that the source is very close to the human, the difference between hearing the two sounds—the emitted sound and the reflected sound—may be more than the minimum time for perceiving distinct sounds. If this is the case,...
Imagine the sound is reflected back to the ears. Assuming that the source is very close to the human, the difference between hearing the two sounds—the emitted sound and the reflected sound—may be more than the minimum time for perceiving distinct sounds. If this is the case,...
738


