Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 30, 2025

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
Published on: January 19, 2019
The Paradox of Group Citizenship and Constructive Deviance: A Resolution of Environmental Dynamism and Moral
Tingting Liu1, Yahui Chen2, Chenhong Hu1
1College of Business Administration, Hunan University of Technology and Business, Changsha 410205, China.
Abstract:
Previous research on antecedents to constructive deviance remains scattered and inclusive. Our study conceptualizes constructive deviance from the perspective of ethical decision making and explores its antecedents, mechanism, and conditions. Drawing on moral licensing theory and social information processing theory, we propose that group citizenship behavior facilitates moral justification and constructive deviance when environmental dynamism is high and inhibits them when it is low; and moral justification fully mediates the relationship between the interaction of group citizenship behavior and environmental dynamism and constructive deviance. With two-wave panel data collected from 339 employees in 54 groups of five service companies in retailing, finance, and tourism randomly selected from three provinces in southern China, these hypotheses are all supported empirically. Our findings broaden the antecedents and occurrence mechanism of constructive deviance through an ethical decision-making lens. Our study contributes to the moral licensing literature by enriching the sources of moral licensing in the workplace and empirically demonstrating that moral justification may function as an underlying mechanism of moral licensing.
More Related Videos
06:42Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
Published on: September 28, 2018
06:18The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
Published on: October 20, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Social Foundations of Self II: The Generalized Other
In- and Out-Groups
Cognitive Dissonance
Group Polarization
Social Traps
Conformity