Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Managing Impressions01:19

Managing Impressions

80
Impression management encompasses individuals' deliberate efforts to shape how others perceive them during social interactions. This behavior is often employed to conform to social norms, secure approval, or pursue specific goals. While it involves selective self-presentation, it is not necessarily deceptive; individuals frequently present authentic aspects of themselves that align with situational demands.Common strategies include:Ingratiation: where individuals use flattery or agreeableness...
80
Impression Management Techniques III: Aligning Actions01:29

Impression Management Techniques III: Aligning Actions

66
Aligning actions are communicative strategies individuals employ to maintain social harmony and preserve personal identity in the face of potential disruptions to social norms. These actions are particularly important in managing social impressions when one's behavior might be seen as inappropriate, incompetent, or morally questionable.Types of Aligning ActionsThe three principal types of aligning actions are disclaimers, accounts, and apologies.DisclaimersDisclaimers are preventive; they are...
66
Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping02:05

Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping

43.0K
People can go to great lengths to protect their self-image and present themselves in ways that they want others to see them. Sociologist Erving Goffman presented the idea that a person is like an actor on a stage. Calling his theory dramaturgy, Goffman believed that we use “impression management” to present ourselves to others as we hope to be perceived. Each situation is a new scene, and individuals perform different roles depending on who is present (Goffman, 1959). Think about...
43.0K
Impression Management Techniques I: Managing Appearances01:29

Impression Management Techniques I: Managing Appearances

100
Appearance is a multidimensional aspect of self-presentation that encompasses observable attributes such as clothing, grooming, speech, and nonverbal behavior. These elements are often strategically managed to align with socially constructed expectations in different settings. For instance, individuals tailor their appearance during job interviews, social gatherings, or athletic events to meet the perceived norms of those environments.Contextual Adaptation and Social SignalsThe research...
100
Strategies of Self-Presentation I: Strategic Self-Presentation01:12

Strategies of Self-Presentation I: Strategic Self-Presentation

116
Strategic self-presentation refers to individuals' intentional efforts to influence how others perceive them. This process is employed in various social and professional settings, such as job interviews, dating, politics, and legal contexts, where individuals seek to shape impressions to gain social or material advantages. While people generally present themselves in ways that align with their authentic characteristics, external factors, such as cognitive load, can hinder their ability to...
116
Strategies of Self-Presentation II: Self-Verification01:17

Strategies of Self-Presentation II: Self-Verification

96
Self-verification is a fundamental psychological drive wherein individuals seek affirmation of their self-concept from others, striving for consistency between their internal self-view and external perceptions. This drive operates even when the self-concept is negative, influencing interpersonal behavior and feedback preferences in complex and often counterintuitive ways. Unlike the self-enhancement motive, which seeks positive evaluations, self-verification prioritizes coherence and...
96

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Draft genomes of two Lethrus species.

Scientific data·2026
Same author

Optimal diving: patch quality, depth, and marginal value.

Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology·2025
Same author

Scales of risk and adaptive 'dread': an evolutionary theory of risk inflation.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Seasonal environmental change and sex change in a cnidarian.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2025
Same author

The effect of mowing and mulching on snail communities: an experiment in wet meadows.

PloS one·2025
Same author

The first complete mitochondrial genome of a <i>Lethrus</i> species (Coleoptera, Geotrupidae) with phylogenetic implications.

ZooKeys·2025
Same journal

Chronic limb loading results in remarkable load carriage economy in growing fowl.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026
Same journal

Motion-from-structure in face perception: expectations of natural face motion depend on face shape.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026
Same journal

Unification and generalization of models of zygote survival.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026
Same journal

Phenological type- and diameter-dependent effects of individual light availability and interannual climate variation on tree growth.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026
Same journal

Interaction range of common goods shapes Black Queen dynamics beyond the cheater-cooperator narrative.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026
Same journal

Stingray spine diversity reflects performance trade-offs linked to puncture and breakability.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 30, 2025

Operant Procedures for Assessing Behavioral Flexibility in Rats
08:30

Operant Procedures for Assessing Behavioral Flexibility in Rats

Published on: February 15, 2015

21.3K

Behavioural flexibility and reputation formation.

John M McNamara1, Zoltan Barta2

  • 1School of Mathematics, University of Bristol, Fry Building, Woodland Road, Bristol BS8 1UG, UK.

Proceedings. Biological Sciences
|November 18, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Behavioral flexibility impacts trust and reputation. High costs of changing behavior when observed can lead to honest signaling, influencing future interactions.

Keywords:
behavioural consistencycost of flexibilityevolutionary game theorypersonalitysignallingtrust

More Related Videos

Assessment of Stress Effects on Cognitive Flexibility using an Operant Strategy Shifting Paradigm
07:26

Assessment of Stress Effects on Cognitive Flexibility using an Operant Strategy Shifting Paradigm

Published on: May 4, 2020

3.7K
New Variations for Strategy Set-shifting in the Rat
09:45

New Variations for Strategy Set-shifting in the Rat

Published on: January 23, 2017

8.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 30, 2025

Operant Procedures for Assessing Behavioral Flexibility in Rats
08:30

Operant Procedures for Assessing Behavioral Flexibility in Rats

Published on: February 15, 2015

21.3K
Assessment of Stress Effects on Cognitive Flexibility using an Operant Strategy Shifting Paradigm
07:26

Assessment of Stress Effects on Cognitive Flexibility using an Operant Strategy Shifting Paradigm

Published on: May 4, 2020

3.7K
New Variations for Strategy Set-shifting in the Rat
09:45

New Variations for Strategy Set-shifting in the Rat

Published on: January 23, 2017

8.4K

Area of Science:

  • Behavioral Economics
  • Game Theory
  • Social Psychology

Background:

  • Behavioral consistency arises from limited flexibility.
  • Reputation, built on observed trustworthiness, signals future behavior.
  • Individuals use reputation to inform trust decisions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Investigate consequences of limited behavioral flexibility in a trust game.
  • Explore the impact of costs associated with behavioral differences (cost of flexibility).
  • Analyze how these costs influence signaling and trust dynamics.

Main Methods:

  • Agent-based modeling or simulation of a trust game.
  • Varying the cost of flexibility (difference in behavior between observed and unobserved states).
  • Analyzing individual strategies and population-level outcomes.

Main Results:

  • Low flexibility costs: individuals do not signal trustworthiness honestly.
  • High flexibility costs: local optimal behavior serves as an honest signal.
  • Intermediate costs: individuals exhibit high trustworthiness when observed to signal future trustworthiness.

Conclusions:

  • The cost of behavioral flexibility significantly shapes signaling strategies in trust interactions.
  • Honest signaling emerges at high flexibility costs, influencing partner selection.
  • Intermediate costs may drive strong signaling behaviors, potentially applicable to other social contexts.