Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 29, 2025

08:08
Simulator Training for Endovascular Neurosurgery
Published on: May 6, 2020
3.9K
Trainees' surgical activity and opportunity to transfer after simulation-based training.
Sigurd Beier Sloth1, Peter Christensen, Rune Dall
1sbs@cesu.au.dk.
Danish Medical Journal
|November 20, 2020
Summary
Simulation-based surgical training (SBST) does not guarantee increased surgical activity for trainees. Opportunities to perform surgery after training are limited, potentially hindering skill transfer and competence development.
Area of Science:
- Medical Education
- Surgical Training
- Surgical Skills Transfer
Background:
- Simulation-based surgical training (SBST) assumes skill transfer to the operating room.
- Previous research focused on performance gains, not opportunities for skill application.
- Limited data exists on the actual clinical exposure of trainees post-simulation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the impact of SBST on surgical trainees' clinical activity.
- To assess the opportunity for surgical trainees to transfer skills acquired through simulation.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective study of first-year surgical trainees (abdominal, gynaecology, urology) in Denmark (2014-2018).
- Analysis of surgical procedure data for trainees participating in open and laparoscopic SBST courses.
- Comparison of surgical activity before and after SBST participation.
Main Results:
- 127 first-year trainees' data were analyzed, showing significant variation in procedures across specialties.
- Median differences in surgical activity post-SBST were minimal (0-3 procedures).
- No significant increase in surgical activity was observed post-SBST in most comparisons (p > 0.05).
Conclusions:
- Trainee surgical exposure varies, potentially impacting specialist competence.
- SBST participants lack timely opportunities to increase clinical surgical activities.
- Delayed practice opportunities may impede skill acquisition and transfer, hindering training effectiveness.

