Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 29, 2025

Flow Cytometry to Estimate Leukemia Stem Cells in Primary Acute Myeloid Leukemia and in Patient-derived-xenografts, at Diagnosis and Follow Up
Published on: March 26, 2018
Routine Evaluation of Minimal Residual Disease in Myeloma Using Next-Generation Sequencing Clonality Testing:
Caleb Ho1, Mustafa Syed2, Mikhail Roshal3
1Hematopathology Service, Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; Diagnostic Molecular Pathology Service, Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Next-generation sequencing (NGS) and high-sensitivity flow cytometry (hsFC) show similar performance for minimal residual disease (MRD) detection in multiple myeloma. Assay selection should prioritize practical considerations over performance differences.
Area of Science:
- Hematology
- Oncology
- Molecular Diagnostics
Background:
- International Myeloma Working Group guidelines recommend high-sensitivity methods for minimal residual disease (MRD) detection in multiple myeloma.
- Next-generation sequencing (NGS) offers high specificity and sensitivity for IGH gene rearrangements, but its clinical application and comparison to high-sensitivity flow cytometry (hsFC) are not well-documented.
Purpose of the Study:
- To describe the clinical use of NGS for IGH and IGK gene rearrangements in multiple myeloma.
- To compare the performance of NGS with hsFC for MRD detection and monitoring.
- To evaluate the prognostic value of MRD detection by NGS and hsFC.
Main Methods:
- A large, single-institution study analyzed 438 samples from 251 multiple myeloma patients.
- NGS was used for clonal characterization and monitoring of IGH and IGK gene rearrangements.
- Results were compared with hsFC for MRD detection and concordance analysis.
Main Results:
- NGS successfully characterized the index clone in 93.6% of patients, with success rates dependent on plasma cell cellularity.
- NGS detected MRD in 78.6% of monitoring samples.
- Concordance between NGS and hsFC was high (92.9%), with discordant cases involving low-level disease near assay detection limits.
Conclusions:
- NGS and hsFC demonstrate similar operational sensitivity for MRD detection in multiple myeloma.
- The choice between NGS and hsFC may be guided by practical rather than performance-based considerations.
- Both assays are valuable tools for MRD assessment, treatment response, and prognostication in multiple myeloma.
More Related Videos
09:57Comprehensive Protocol to Sample and Process Bone Marrow for Measuring Measurable Residual Disease and Leukemic Stem Cells in Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Published on: March 5, 2018
12:05Database-guided Flow-cytometry for Evaluation of Bone Marrow Myeloid Cell Maturation
Published on: November 3, 2018