Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Induction01:16

Induction

5.2K
An emf is induced when the magnetic field in a coil is changed by pushing a bar magnet into or out of the coil. emfs of opposite signs are produced by motion in opposite directions, and the directions of emfs are also reversed by reversing poles. The same results are produced if the coil is moved rather than the magnet—it is the relative motion that is important. The faster the motion, the greater the emf. Additionally, there is no emf when the magnet is stationary relative to the coil.
A...
5.2K
Charging Conductors By Induction01:15

Charging Conductors By Induction

8.8K
The Earth is a good conductor of electricity, and it is so big that it can be considered an infinite source or sink of charges. It can easily exchange charges with any matter.
Generally, conductors like metals do not allow any excess charge to be present on them. Any excess charge added to metals easily flows away, for example, when a metal is placed on the Earth. This process is called earthing.
However, conductors can be charged by a process called induction. For example, consider charging a...
8.8K
Mathematical Induction01:29

Mathematical Induction

112
Mathematical induction is a structured method of proof used to confirm the truth of statements involving natural numbers. Consider the sum of the first n natural numbers:This formula describes a pattern that appears to hold true as more terms are added. To verify that it is valid for all natural numbers, mathematical induction proceeds in two essential steps. The first is the base case, where the formula is tested for the initial value, typically n = 1. Substituting into both sides confirms the...
112
Induced Electric Dipoles01:28

Induced Electric Dipoles

4.6K
A permanent electric dipole orients itself along an external electric field. This rotation can be quantified by defining the potential energy because the external torque does work in rotating it. Then, the potential energy is minimum at the parallel configuration and maximum at the antiparallel configuration. While the former is a stable equilibrium, the latter is an unstable equilibrium.
Since the absolute value of potential energy holds no physical meaning, its zero value can be chosen as per...
4.6K
Inductors01:20

Inductors

5.8K
An inductor, also known as a choke, is a circuit component created to have a specific inductance. Inductors are among the crucial circuit components used in modern electronics, along with resistors and capacitors. They serve as a barrier against changes in a circuit's current. An inductor tends to suppress current changes in an alternating-current circuit that are faster than desired. In a direct-current circuit, an inductor aids in preserving a constant current despite changes in the...
5.8K
Inductors01:11

Inductors

753
An inductor is a passive component built to store energy within its magnetic field. It can be fabricated by coiling a wire around a magnetic core. When current is permitted to flow through this inductor, it is observed that the voltage across the inductor is directly proportional to the time rate of change of the current. Mathematically,
753

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Authenticity or Risk?

AJOB neuroscience·2024
Same author

Probability and informed consent.

Theoretical medicine and bioethics·2023
Same author

Interpreting Behavior Genetic Models: Seven Developmental Processes to Understand.

Behavior genetics·2018
Same author

Two types of typicality: rethinking the role of statistical typicality in ordinary causal attributions.

Studies in history and philosophy of biological and biomedical sciences·2012
Same journal

Transferring ways of thinking and mathematizing: The statistical approach between physics and biology.

Studies in history and philosophy of science·2026
Same journal

The Dynamics of Quantum Gravity: The Missing Piece in the Spacetime Emergentist Account.

Studies in history and philosophy of science·2026
Same journal

A frame-based approach for reconstructing theories.

Studies in history and philosophy of science·2026
Same journal

Strategic ignorance, and the management of performative effects: Lessons from climate economics.

Studies in history and philosophy of science·2026
Same journal

Fictionalism and scientific realism: A response to ungrounded criticism.

Studies in history and philosophy of science·2026
Same journal

Is Emergy really a theory of value ?

Studies in history and philosophy of science·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 29, 2025

Quantifying the Relative Thickness of Conductive Ferromagnetic Materials Using Detector Coil-Based Pulsed Eddy Current Sensors
06:17

Quantifying the Relative Thickness of Conductive Ferromagnetic Materials Using Detector Coil-Based Pulsed Eddy Current Sensors

Published on: January 16, 2020

6.0K

Debunking material induction.

Jonathan Livengood1, Daniel Z Korman2

  • 1University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA.

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science
|November 21, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This paper objects to Norton's material theory of induction, highlighting an explanatory gap in predictive inferences. This disconnect between future beliefs and facts undermines rational entitlement to those beliefs.

Keywords:
DebunkingExplanatory constraintInductionMaterial theoryNorton

More Related Videos

A Simple Non-invasive Method for Temporary Knockdown of Upper Limb Proprioception
07:42

A Simple Non-invasive Method for Temporary Knockdown of Upper Limb Proprioception

Published on: March 3, 2018

9.7K
Spatial Separation of Molecular Conformers and Clusters
10:37

Spatial Separation of Molecular Conformers and Clusters

Published on: January 9, 2014

11.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 29, 2025

Quantifying the Relative Thickness of Conductive Ferromagnetic Materials Using Detector Coil-Based Pulsed Eddy Current Sensors
06:17

Quantifying the Relative Thickness of Conductive Ferromagnetic Materials Using Detector Coil-Based Pulsed Eddy Current Sensors

Published on: January 16, 2020

6.0K
A Simple Non-invasive Method for Temporary Knockdown of Upper Limb Proprioception
07:42

A Simple Non-invasive Method for Temporary Knockdown of Upper Limb Proprioception

Published on: March 3, 2018

9.7K
Spatial Separation of Molecular Conformers and Clusters
10:37

Spatial Separation of Molecular Conformers and Clusters

Published on: January 9, 2014

11.4K

Area of Science:

  • Philosophy of Science
  • Epistemology

Background:

  • Norton's material theory of induction provides a framework for understanding inductive reasoning.
  • Predictive inferences, crucial for scientific and everyday reasoning, rely on established inductive principles.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present an explanatory objection to Norton's material theory of induction.
  • To analyze the implications of this objection for the rationality of predictive inferences.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual analysis of Norton's material theory of induction.
  • Examination of the relationship between beliefs about the future and future facts.
  • Argumentation based on the concept of explanatory disconnect.

Main Results:

  • An explanatory disconnect is identified between beliefs about the future and actual future facts.
  • This disconnect challenges the foundation of predictive inferences under Norton's theory.

Conclusions:

  • The presented objection reveals a potential flaw in the material theory of induction concerning future predictions.
  • Recognizing the explanatory disconnect implies that current beliefs about the future may not be rationally justified.