Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Contemporary Benchmarks in Breast Augmentation Surgery.

Clinics in plastic surgery·2026
Same author

High-Resolution Ultrasound and Postoperative Surveillance of the Augmented Breast.

Clinics in plastic surgery·2026
Same author

Breast Implant Illness: Current Knowledge on Potential Etiology, Evaluation, and Patient Management.

Clinics in plastic surgery·2026
Same author

Breast Augmentation.

Clinics in plastic surgery·2026
Same author

Thirty-Year Overview of the Literature Pertaining to Systemic Symptoms Associated With Breast Implants.

Aesthetic surgery journal·2026
Same author

Advancement Heralder, Research Kindler:Aesthetic Breast Surgery and Aesthetic Surgery Journal.

Aesthetic surgery journal·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 29, 2025

Effects of Mechanical Methods Used in Peri-implantitis Treatment on Implant Surface Decontamination and Roughness
06:36

Effects of Mechanical Methods Used in Peri-implantitis Treatment on Implant Surface Decontamination and Roughness

Published on: March 14, 2025

601

Implant Shell Characteristics: The Science Behind the Surface.

Caroline A Glicksman1

  • 1Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine at Seton Hall, Nutley, NJ, USA.

Clinics in Plastic Surgery
|November 22, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Modern breast implant design focuses on surface interactions. Future designs will engineer surface structure and chemistry to improve long-term outcomes and reduce bacterial attachment.

Keywords:
BiocompatibilityBreast implantsCapsular contractureSurface scienceTextured breast implants

More Related Videos

An Improved Mechanical Testing Method to Assess Bone-implant Anchorage
11:51

An Improved Mechanical Testing Method to Assess Bone-implant Anchorage

Published on: February 10, 2014

15.8K
Tools for Surface Treatment of Silicon Planar Intracortical Microelectrodes
06:39

Tools for Surface Treatment of Silicon Planar Intracortical Microelectrodes

Published on: June 8, 2022

2.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 29, 2025

Effects of Mechanical Methods Used in Peri-implantitis Treatment on Implant Surface Decontamination and Roughness
06:36

Effects of Mechanical Methods Used in Peri-implantitis Treatment on Implant Surface Decontamination and Roughness

Published on: March 14, 2025

601
An Improved Mechanical Testing Method to Assess Bone-implant Anchorage
11:51

An Improved Mechanical Testing Method to Assess Bone-implant Anchorage

Published on: February 10, 2014

15.8K
Tools for Surface Treatment of Silicon Planar Intracortical Microelectrodes
06:39

Tools for Surface Treatment of Silicon Planar Intracortical Microelectrodes

Published on: June 8, 2022

2.7K

Area of Science:

  • Biomaterials Science
  • Medical Device Engineering
  • Host-Material Interactions

Background:

  • Current breast implant design prioritizes the host response, focusing on surface characteristics like roughness and area.
  • These surface properties influence bacterial attachment, a critical factor in implant outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the importance of surface characteristics in breast implant design.
  • To explore the potential of bioengineering to modify implant surfaces for improved long-term results.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of current breast implant surface characterization methods.
  • Review of bioengineering principles applicable to device surface modification.

Main Results:

  • Implant surface roughness, surface area, and bacterial attachment potential are key design considerations.
  • Transforming surface structure and chemical properties offers a pathway for future implant development.

Conclusions:

  • Future breast implant innovation hinges on advanced bioengineering of device surfaces.
  • Modifying surface properties can significantly impact long-term patient outcomes and implant performance.