Induced Experimental Peri-Implantitis and Periodontitis: What Are the Differences in the Inflammatory Response?

This preliminary study investigates the differences between experimental periodontitis and peri-implantitis in a dog model, with a focus on the histopathology, inflammatory responses, and specific immunoregulatory activities driven by Th1/Th2-positive cells. Twelve dental implants were inserted into the edentulated posterior mandibles of 6 beagle dogs and were given 12 weeks for osseointegration. Experimental peri-implantitis and periodontitis (first mandible molar) were then induced using cotton-floss ligatures. Twelve weeks later, alveolar bones were quantitated by cone beam-computer tomography. Histopathologic analysis of the inflamed gingiva and periodontal tissues was performed by light microscopy, and the Th1/Th2 cell populations were investigated by flow cytometry. Peri-implantitis and periodontitis were both found to be associated with pronounced bone resorption effects, both to a similar degree vertically, but with a differential bone resorption pattern mesio-distally, and with a significantly higher and consistent bone resorption result in peri-implantitis, although with a higher variance of bone resorption in periodontitis. The histologic appearances of the inflammatory tissues were identical. The percentages of Th1/Th2 cells in the inflamed gingival tissues of both experimental peri-implantitis and periodontitis were also found to be similar. Experimental periodontitis and peri-implantitis in the dog model show essentially the same cellular pathology of inflammation. However, bone resorption was found to be significantly higher in peri-implantitis; the histopathologic changes in the periodontal tissues were similar in both groups but showed a higher interindividual variation in periodontitis and appeared more uniform in peri-implantitis. This preliminary study indicates that more focused experimental in vivo inflammation models need to be developed to better simulate the human pathology in the 2 different diseases and to have a valuable tool to investigate more specifically how novel treatments/prevention approaches may heal the differential adverse effects on bone tissue and on periodontium in periodontitis and in periimplantitis.