Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 27, 2025

06:38
Using a Virtual Reality Walking Simulator to Investigate Pedestrian Behavior
Published on: June 9, 2020
5.1K
Investigating the Randomness of Passengers' Seating Behavior in Suburban Trains
Jakob Schöttl1, Michael J Seitz1, Gerta Köster1
1Department of Computer Science and Mathematics, Munich University of Applied Sciences, Lothstr. 34, 80335 Munich, Germany.
Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)
|December 3, 2020
Summary
Passenger seating preferences in trains are not random, challenging uniform distribution assumptions in crowd simulation models. This study models observed behaviors for better public transport simulations.
Area of Science:
- Pedestrian dynamics
- Crowd simulation
- Transportation modeling
Background:
- Individual-based models are crucial for simulating crowd behavior in public transport.
- Current models often assume uniform passenger distribution, potentially misrepresenting capacity utilization and passenger flow.
- Limited research exists on specific passenger seating behavior within trains.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate passenger seating preferences in real-world train environments.
- To challenge the assumption of uniform passenger distribution in simulation models.
- To develop and validate a new model for passenger seating behavior in trains.
Main Methods:
- Data collection on seating behavior in Munich's suburban trains.
- Statistical analysis of observed seating patterns.
- Development of a new simulation model based on empirical data.
Main Results:
- Passenger seating is not uniformly distributed; clear preferences were observed.
- Empirical data contradicts the assumption of random or thermodynamically driven distribution.
- The developed model accurately reflects the observed probability distributions.
Conclusions:
- Passenger behavior in trains exhibits non-uniform patterns, necessitating refined simulation approaches.
- The new model enhances the accuracy of pedestrian dynamics simulations for public transport.
- The model is integrated into the open-source Vadere framework for broader application.
Keywords:
agent based modelsentropyfield observationpedestrian behaviorrandomnessseating behaviortraffic and crowd dynamicstraffic modelsMore Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Probability Histograms
12.9K
A probability histogram is a visual representation of a probability distribution. Similar a typical histogram, the probability histogram consists of contiguous (adjoining) boxes. It has both a horizontal axis and a vertical axis. The horizontal axis is labeled with what the data represents. The vertical axis is labeled with probability. Each rectangular bar in the histogram is 1 unit wide, which suggests that the area under each bar equals the probability, P(x), where x is 1, 2, 3, and so on.
12.9K
Randomized Experiments
8.6K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
Simple randomization
Simple...
8.6K
Unusual Results
3.6K
Unusual results are those that have a very low chance of occurring. Unusual results can be identified using probabilities and the range rule of thumb. In problems involving probability, unusual results can be observed in 2 instances – an unusually high number of successes or an unusually low number of successes.
According to the range rule of thumb, any value above or below two standard deviations, 2σ from the mean, μ is considered unusual.
Maximum unusual value =...
According to the range rule of thumb, any value above or below two standard deviations, 2σ from the mean, μ is considered unusual.
Maximum unusual value =...
3.6K
Group Design
10.0K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
10.0K
Random Variables
16.8K
A random variable is a single numerical value that indicates the outcome of a procedure. The concept of random variables is fundamental to the probability theory and was introduced by a Russian mathematician, Pafnuty Chebyshev, in the mid-nineteenth century.
Uppercase letters such as X or Y denote a random variable. Lowercase letters like x or y denote the value of a random variable. If X is a random variable, then X is written in words, and x is given as a number.
For example, let X = the...
Uppercase letters such as X or Y denote a random variable. Lowercase letters like x or y denote the value of a random variable. If X is a random variable, then X is written in words, and x is given as a number.
For example, let X = the...
16.8K
Random Error
6.1K
Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...
6.1K

