Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Gauss's Law01:07

Gauss's Law

8.9K
If a closed surface does not have any charge inside where an electric field line can terminate, then the electric field line entering the surface at one point must necessarily exit at some other point of the surface. Therefore, if a closed surface does not have any charges inside the enclosed volume, then the electric flux through the surface is zero. What happens to the electric flux if there are some charges inside the enclosed volume? Gauss's law gives a quantitative answer to this question.
8.9K
Gauss's Law: Problem-Solving01:10

Gauss's Law: Problem-Solving

2.4K
Gauss's law helps determine electric fields even though the law is not directly about electric fields but electric flux. In situations with certain symmetries (spherical, cylindrical, or planar) in the charge distribution, the electric field can be deduced based on the knowledge of the electric flux. In these systems, we can find a Gaussian surface S over which the electric field has a constant magnitude. Furthermore, suppose the electric field is parallel (or antiparallel) to the area vector...
2.4K
Gauss's Law: Planar Symmetry01:27

Gauss's Law: Planar Symmetry

9.0K
A planar symmetry of charge density is obtained when charges are uniformly spread over a large flat surface. In planar symmetry, all points in a plane parallel to the plane of charge are identical with respect to the charges. Suppose the plane of the charge distribution is the xy-plane, and the electric field at a space point P with coordinates (x, y, z) is to be determined. Since the charge density is the same at all (x, y) - coordinates in the z = 0 plane, by symmetry, the electric field at P...
9.0K
Gauss's Law: Cylindrical Symmetry01:20

Gauss's Law: Cylindrical Symmetry

8.9K
A charge distribution has cylindrical symmetry if the charge density depends only upon the distance from the axis of the cylinder and does not vary along the axis or with the direction about the axis. In other words, if a system varies if it is rotated around the axis or shifted along the axis, it does not have cylindrical symmetry. In real systems, we do not have infinite cylinders; however, if the cylindrical object is considerably longer than the radius from it that we are interested in,...
8.9K
Gauss's Law in Dielectrics01:17

Gauss's Law in Dielectrics

4.9K
Consider a polar dielectric placed in an external field. In such a dielectric, opposite charges on adjacent dipoles neutralize each other, such that the net charge within the dielectric is zero. When a polar dielectric is inserted in between the capacitor plates, an electric field is generated due to the presence of net charges near the edge of the dielectric and the metal plates interface. Since the external electrical field merely aligns the dipoles, the dielectric as a whole is neutral. An...
4.9K
Gauss's Law: Spherical Symmetry01:26

Gauss's Law: Spherical Symmetry

8.7K
A charge distribution has spherical symmetry if the density of charge depends only on the distance from a point in space and not on the direction. In other words, if the system is rotated, it doesn't look different. For instance, if a sphere of radius R is uniformly charged with charge density ρ0, then the distribution has spherical symmetry. On the other hand, if a sphere of radius R is charged so that the top half of the sphere has a uniform charge density ρ1 and the bottom half has a...
8.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Automating the Search for Artificial Life With Foundation Models.

Artificial life·2025
Same journal

Research on a Regional Availability Evaluation Model for Road-Area High-Entropy Energy Based on Synergy Factors.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Atmospheric Turbulence Channel Modeling and Performance Analysis of a CO-ZP-OFDM Coherent Optical Communication System for UAV Air-to-Ground Scenarios.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Information Geometry and Asymptotic Theory for SMML Estimators.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Correlation Entropy and Power-Law Kinetics.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Research on the Contagion of Systemic Financial Risk Under the Impact of Climate Risks-From the Perspective of Complex Networks and Machine Learning.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

The Statistical-Mechanical Meaning of the Wave Function of Quantum Mechanics.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 27, 2025

Lens-free Video Microscopy for the Dynamic and Quantitative Analysis of Adherent Cell Culture
09:04

Lens-free Video Microscopy for the Dynamic and Quantitative Analysis of Adherent Cell Culture

Published on: February 23, 2018

9.8K

Gaussian Mean Field Regularizes by Limiting Learned Information.

Julius Kunze1, Louis Kirsch1,2, Hippolyt Ritter1

  • 1Computer Science, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)
|December 3, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Mean field inference, a method for variational inference, enhances neural network generalization by reducing information between parameters and data. This noise-induced regularization limits generalization error, offering insights into model capacity.

Keywords:
information theorymachine learningvariational inference

More Related Videos

Setting Limits on Supersymmetry Using Simplified Models
07:46

Setting Limits on Supersymmetry Using Simplified Models

Published on: November 15, 2013

8.8K
Diffusion Tensor Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Analysis of Neurodegenerative Diseases
09:33

Diffusion Tensor Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Analysis of Neurodegenerative Diseases

Published on: July 28, 2013

28.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 27, 2025

Lens-free Video Microscopy for the Dynamic and Quantitative Analysis of Adherent Cell Culture
09:04

Lens-free Video Microscopy for the Dynamic and Quantitative Analysis of Adherent Cell Culture

Published on: February 23, 2018

9.8K
Setting Limits on Supersymmetry Using Simplified Models
07:46

Setting Limits on Supersymmetry Using Simplified Models

Published on: November 15, 2013

8.8K
Diffusion Tensor Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Analysis of Neurodegenerative Diseases
09:33

Diffusion Tensor Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Analysis of Neurodegenerative Diseases

Published on: July 28, 2013

28.9K

Area of Science:

  • Machine Learning
  • Statistical Inference
  • Deep Learning

Background:

  • Variational inference with factorized Gaussian posteriors is common for learning model parameters and hidden variables.
  • A poorly understood regularizing effect is empirically observed in these methods.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To elucidate the mechanism by which mean field inference improves generalization.
  • To quantify the relationship between posterior variance, model capacity, and generalization error.

Main Methods:

  • Analyzing mean field inference to demonstrate its information-limiting properties.
  • Quantifying model capacity in relation to posterior variance (fixed or learned).
  • Connecting information bounds between parameters and data to generalization error.

Main Results:

  • Mean field inference limits mutual information between parameters and data via noise, improving generalization.
  • A maximum model capacity is identified, linked to generalization error, irrespective of KL-divergence scaling.
  • Bounding information between parameters and data acts as an effective regularizer for neural networks.

Conclusions:

  • Mean field variational inference provides a principled way to regularize neural networks.
  • Understanding and controlling mutual information is key to improving generalization in deep learning models.
  • The findings offer theoretical and empirical support for using information-theoretic approaches in model training.