Comparison of ZMAC and MARC-145 Cell Lines for Improving Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus

Wannarat Yim-Im1, Haiyan Huang1, Jie Park1

  • 1Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA.

Insights

The ZMAC cell line shows improved porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) isolation from clinical samples compared to MARC-145 cells. ZMAC cells offer better PRRSV isolation rates, particularly from lung and serum samples, aiding diagnostics and vaccine development.

Area of Science:

  • Veterinary Virology
  • Cell Biology
  • Animal Health

Background:

  • Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) isolation is crucial for diagnostics, research, and vaccine production.
  • The MARC-145 cell line is standard for PRRSV isolation but has low success rates.
  • The ZMAC cell line, derived from porcine alveolar macrophages, is a potential alternative for PRRSV isolation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the efficiency of ZMAC and MARC-145 cell lines for PRRSV virus isolation (VI) from diverse clinical samples.
  • To evaluate the impact of sample type and PRRSV genetic lineage on VI success rates in ZMAC versus MARC-145 cells.
  • To provide guidelines for optimizing PRRSV isolation from clinical specimens.

Main Methods:

  • PRRSV VI was performed on 375 clinical samples (lung, serum, oral fluid, processing fluid) using both ZMAC and MARC-145 cell lines.
  • Virus isolation success rates were compared between the two cell lines across different sample types.
  • PRRSV isolates were characterized based on genetic lineage and their ability to grow in the alternative cell line.

Main Results:

  • PRRSV VI success rates were low in oral and processing fluids for both cell lines.
  • ZMAC cells demonstrated significantly higher PRRSV VI success rates than MARC-145 cells for lung and serum samples.
  • Lower Ct values (<30) in samples correlated with improved VI success; ZMAC showed better isolation for PRRSV-2 lineages 1 and 8.

Conclusions:

  • ZMAC cells provide superior PRRSV isolation efficiency from lung and serum samples compared to MARC-145 cells.
  • While ZMAC cells isolate a broader range of PRRSV field strains, not all isolates grow in MARC-145 cells.
  • These findings offer critical insights for enhancing PRRSV isolation strategies in veterinary diagnostics and vaccine development.

Related Concept Videos