Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

7.2K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
7.2K
Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping02:05

Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping

43.0K
People can go to great lengths to protect their self-image and present themselves in ways that they want others to see them. Sociologist Erving Goffman presented the idea that a person is like an actor on a stage. Calling his theory dramaturgy, Goffman believed that we use “impression management” to present ourselves to others as we hope to be perceived. Each situation is a new scene, and individuals perform different roles depending on who is present (Goffman, 1959). Think about...
43.0K
Self-Regulation01:25

Self-Regulation

123
Self-regulation, also known as self-control, encompasses a range of cognitive and behavioral processes that allow individuals to adjust their internal states and outward actions to align with socially acceptable norms and long-term goals. It plays a fundamental role in adaptive functioning, from resisting impulsive behaviors to persisting through challenging tasks. While its benefits are widely recognized, self-regulation is not limitless. Muraven and Baumeister's theory posits that...
123
Self-Report Tests of Personality01:22

Self-Report Tests of Personality

593
Self-report inventories are objective personality assessments that use multiple-choice items or numbered scales, typically ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). They are often called Likert scales after Rensis Likert. These inventories are widely used due to their ease of administration and cost-effectiveness. One of the most prominent examples is the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI), initially developed in the 1940s to assess abnormal personality traits.
593
Motivational Bias01:25

Motivational Bias

214
Cognitive bias results from limitations in thinking and information processing, leading to systematic errors in judgment. Conversely, motivational bias stems from personal desires or emotions, causing distortions in perception to align with self-interest. Motivational bias influences how individuals perceive and attribute causes to events, often shaped by personal needs, goals, and self-esteem preservation. This bias can distort judgment, leading to inaccurate assessments of success, failure,...
214
Causes of Social Behavior II: Cognitive Processes01:15

Causes of Social Behavior II: Cognitive Processes

130
Cognitive processes affect social behavior by guiding how individuals perceive, interpret, and respond to social stimuli. These mental processes enable individuals to assess others' behaviors, attribute causes to their actions, and form expectations based on past experiences.Causes of Behavior and Social JudgmentsIndividuals determine the causes of others' behaviors by distinguishing between personal traits and external circumstances. For example, if a friend frequently arrives late, an...
130

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A Cerebral Basis for Visual Discomfort and Visual Stress.

Vision (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Exploring the association between mental imagery, sensory sensitivity, and autistic traits in autistic and non-autistic adults.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Sensory sensitivity and visual discomfort are not associated with altered gamma oscillations: A test of the excitation-inhibition hypothesis.

Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same author

Validating the Client Oriented Scale of Improvement for Dizziness and Imbalance (COSIDI).

International journal of audiology·2025
Same author

Sensory hyperacusis as a predictor of anxiety in adolescence.

Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines·2025
Same author

The cognitive cerebellum: linking microstructure to cognitive functions in a healthy population.

NeuroImage·2025
Same journal

Do maternal and paternal social trait anxiety explain individual differences in offspring stress reactions during a social performance task?

Personality and individual differences·2026
Same journal

Social Media Use, Personality Characteristics, and Social Isolation among Young Adults in the United States.

Personality and individual differences·2026
Same journal

Corrigendum to "Modeling temporal self-continuity and its association with temporal discounting" [Personality and Individual Differences 246 (2025) 113354].

Personality and individual differences·2026
Same journal

Brief Report: Aspects of Preschool Personality Predict Sexual Behavior in Young Adulthood.

Personality and individual differences·2026
Same journal

Personality predictors of longitudinal adaptation following the COVID-19 pandemic.

Personality and individual differences·2026
Same journal

Loneliness Moderates Affective Responses to Uplifts in Everyday Life.

Personality and individual differences·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 27, 2025

Three Laboratory Procedures for Assessing Different Manifestations of Impulsivity in Rats
09:12

Three Laboratory Procedures for Assessing Different Manifestations of Impulsivity in Rats

Published on: March 17, 2019

9.7K

Self-reported impulsivity does not predict response caution.

Craig Hedge1, Georgina Powell2, Aline Bompas1

  • 1CUBRIC - School of Psychology, Cardiff University, UK.

Personality and Individual Differences
|December 4, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study found no link between self-reported impulsivity and response caution, a measure of decision-making speed versus accuracy. These findings suggest distinct underlying factors for impulsivity and cognitive processing strategies.

Keywords:
Boundary separationDiffusion modelImpulsivityInhibitionResponse cautionResponse controlSelf-controlUPPS-P

More Related Videos

The 5-Choice Serial Reaction Time Task: A Task of Attention and Impulse Control for Rodents
09:43

The 5-Choice Serial Reaction Time Task: A Task of Attention and Impulse Control for Rodents

Published on: August 10, 2014

46.6K
A Conflict Model of Reward-seeking Behavior in Male Rats
06:11

A Conflict Model of Reward-seeking Behavior in Male Rats

Published on: February 20, 2019

7.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 27, 2025

Three Laboratory Procedures for Assessing Different Manifestations of Impulsivity in Rats
09:12

Three Laboratory Procedures for Assessing Different Manifestations of Impulsivity in Rats

Published on: March 17, 2019

9.7K
The 5-Choice Serial Reaction Time Task: A Task of Attention and Impulse Control for Rodents
09:43

The 5-Choice Serial Reaction Time Task: A Task of Attention and Impulse Control for Rodents

Published on: August 10, 2014

46.6K
A Conflict Model of Reward-seeking Behavior in Male Rats
06:11

A Conflict Model of Reward-seeking Behavior in Male Rats

Published on: February 20, 2019

7.6K

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Personality Science

Background:

  • Impulsivity is a broad construct encompassing personality and cognitive traits.
  • Previous research shows no correlation between self-report impulsivity measures and response inhibition.
  • Existing measures may not capture the cognitive underpinnings of self-reported impulsivity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the relationship between self-reported impulsivity and response caution, a cognitive measure.
  • To determine if response caution, derived from evidence accumulation models, aligns with personality-based impulsivity traits.
  • To clarify the distinct factors contributing to impulsivity and cognitive information processing.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized evidence accumulation models on choice reaction time tasks to quantify response caution (boundary separation).
  • Examined correlations between response caution and self-reported impulsivity using the UPPS-P questionnaire.
  • Conducted a meta-analysis of five datasets (N=296) to assess the relationship across multiple studies.

Main Results:

  • No significant correlation was observed between response caution and self-reported impulsivity.
  • Average correlations between response caution and UPPS-P subscales were negligible (rho = -0.02 to -0.04).
  • The findings indicate that response caution does not align with self-reported impulsivity traits.

Conclusions:

  • Response caution, while valuable for understanding cognitive differences, is distinct from the construct of impulsivity measured by self-report.
  • The factors underlying "impulsive information processing" appear separate from self-reported impulsivity.
  • Future research should explore alternative cognitive measures to better understand self-reported impulsivity.