Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Kinematic Equations: Problem Solving01:15

Kinematic Equations: Problem Solving

25.4K
When analyzing one-dimensional motion with constant acceleration, the problem-solving strategy involves identifying the known quantities and choosing the appropriate kinematic equations to solve for the unknowns. Either one or two kinematic equations are needed to solve for the unknowns, depending on the known and unknown quantities. Generally, the number of equations required is the same as the number of unknown quantities in the given example. Two-body pursuit problems always require two...
25.4K
Rigid Body Equilibrium Problems - II01:21

Rigid Body Equilibrium Problems - II

7.8K
A rigid body is in static equilibrium when the net force and the net torque acting on the system are equal to zero.
Consider two children sitting on a seesaw, which has negligible mass. The first child has a mass (m1) of 26 kg and sits at point A, which is 1.6 meters (r1) from the pivot point B; the second child has a mass (m2) of 32 kg and sits at point C. How far from the pivot point B should the second child sit (r2) to balance the seesaw?
7.8K
Rigid Body Equilibrium Problems - I00:49

Rigid Body Equilibrium Problems - I

5.1K
A rigid body is said to be in static equilibrium when the net force and the net torque acting on the system is equal to zero. To solve for rigid body equilibrium problems, do the following steps.
5.1K
Kinematic Equations - III01:18

Kinematic Equations - III

9.9K
The first two kinematic equations have time as a variable, but the third kinematic equation is independent of time. This equation expresses final velocity as a function of the acceleration and distance over which it acts. The fourth kinematic equation does not have an acceleration term and provides the final position of the object at time t in terms of the initial and final velocities. This equation is useful when the value of the constant acceleration is unknown.
Using the kinematic equations,...
9.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Effects of Egocentric and Exocentric Supervisor Viewpoint Perspectives on Motion Plan Legibility and Decision Support in Automated Spacecraft Docking Maneuvers.

Human factors·2026
Same author

Measuring the Effect of a Powered Ankle Exoskeleton on Street Crossing Decisions for Novice Users Without Mobility Limitations.

Human factors·2025
Same author

Defining a systems framework for characterizing physical work demands with wearable sensors.

Annals of work exposures and health·2024
Same author

Telerehabilitation use and experiences in occupational and physical therapy through the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic.

PloS one·2023
Same author

Ankle exoskeleton torque controllers based on soleus muscle models.

PloS one·2023
Same author

Impact of Haptic Cues and an Active Ankle Exoskeleton on Gait Characteristics.

Human factors·2022
Same journal

RETRACTED: Zhang et al. A Novel Framework for Reconstruction and Imaging of Target Scattering Centers via Wide-Angle Incidence in Radar Networks. <i>Sensors</i> 2025, <i>25</i>, 6802.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Enhancing Unsupervised Multi-Source Domain Adaptation for Person Re-Identification via Mixture of Experts and Graph-Based Relation.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Development of an Instrumented Glove for Palmar Pressure Assessment in Kayakers.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Development and Experimental Validation of an Autonomous IoT-Based Monitoring System for Real-Time Water Quality Assessment in the Amazon River.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Semi-Supervised Adversarial Learning Framework for Controller Area Network Bus Intrusion Detection.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Smart Optimization Method for Safety Signs in Innovative Manufacturing Environments Integrating Industrial Field IoT Sensors and Knowledge Graphs.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 27, 2025

Estimation of Contact Regions Between Hands and Objects During Human Multi-Digit Grasping
09:41

Estimation of Contact Regions Between Hands and Objects During Human Multi-Digit Grasping

Published on: April 21, 2023

2.0K

Body-Worn IMU Human Skeletal Pose Estimation Using a Factor Graph-Based Optimization Framework.

Timothy McGrath1, Leia Stirling2

  • 1Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
|December 5, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a new method for estimating human joint angles using inertial measurement units (IMUs) without relying on magnetometers. The technique achieves accuracy comparable to existing methods, even in challenging indoor environments.

Keywords:
biomechanicsfactor graphhuman motioninertial measurement systemjoint anglekneeoptimizationself-calibratingsoft tissue artifacts

More Related Videos

A Human-machine-interface Integrating Low-cost Sensors with a Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation System for Post-stroke Balance Rehabilitation
11:06

A Human-machine-interface Integrating Low-cost Sensors with a Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation System for Post-stroke Balance Rehabilitation

Published on: April 12, 2016

10.7K
Subject-specific Musculoskeletal Model for Studying Bone Strain During Dynamic Motion
09:32

Subject-specific Musculoskeletal Model for Studying Bone Strain During Dynamic Motion

Published on: April 11, 2018

10.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 27, 2025

Estimation of Contact Regions Between Hands and Objects During Human Multi-Digit Grasping
09:41

Estimation of Contact Regions Between Hands and Objects During Human Multi-Digit Grasping

Published on: April 21, 2023

2.0K
A Human-machine-interface Integrating Low-cost Sensors with a Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation System for Post-stroke Balance Rehabilitation
11:06

A Human-machine-interface Integrating Low-cost Sensors with a Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation System for Post-stroke Balance Rehabilitation

Published on: April 12, 2016

10.7K
Subject-specific Musculoskeletal Model for Studying Bone Strain During Dynamic Motion
09:32

Subject-specific Musculoskeletal Model for Studying Bone Strain During Dynamic Motion

Published on: April 11, 2018

10.0K

Area of Science:

  • Biomechanics
  • Human Motion Analysis
  • Wearable Sensor Technology

Background:

  • Inertial measurement units (IMUs) for human joint angle estimation typically require sensor calibration or specific motions.
  • Magnetometers, often used for heading reference in IMU systems, are unreliable indoors, leading to estimation issues.
  • Existing IMU methods without magnetometers face unobservability challenges.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a novel magnetometer-free human joint angle estimation method for lower body kinematics.
  • To address unobservability issues in IMU-based motion tracking without magnetic sensors.
  • To enhance the accuracy and robustness of IMU-based human motion analysis.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a magnetometer-free IMU estimation approach utilizing lower body kinematics for sufficient degrees of freedom excitation.
  • Introduced an expanded lower body model including a novel knee hinge model, anthropometry, and segment length discrepancies.
  • Formulated the maximum a posteriori problem as a factor graph and employed post-hoc, on-manifold global optimization for inference.

Main Results:

  • Achieved root mean square error (RMSE) of 4.34° for knee flexion/extension angle estimation.
  • Demonstrated accuracy comparable to state-of-the-art methods that utilize magnetometers.
  • Validated the method on 12 participants performing a prescribed human motion profile task.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed magnetometer-free method provides robust lower body joint angle estimation.
  • The framework offers desirable observability qualities without relying on potentially unreliable indoor magnetic field data.
  • The developed system is extensible for modeling additional joints and constraints in human motion analysis.