Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Deconvolution01:20

Deconvolution

424
Deconvolution, also known as inverse filtering, is the process of extracting the impulse response from known input and output signals. This technique is vital in scenarios where the system's characteristics are unknown, and they must be inferred from the observable signals.
Deconvolution involves several mathematical techniques to derive the impulse response. One common approach is polynomial division. In this method, the input and output sequences are treated as coefficients of...
424

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

GPDM: generation-prior diffusion model for accelerated direct attenuation and scatter correction of whole-body18F-FDG PET.

Physics in medicine and biology·2026
Same author

First-in-Human Imaging Results of PHAROS: A Versatile High-Resolution TOF/DOI PET Scanner for Brain, Breast, and Extremity Imaging.

Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine·2026
Same author

Influence of scintillation light confinement on depth-of-interaction measurement performance in a single-ended readout PET detector.

Physics in medicine and biology·2026
Same author

Photoacoustic computed tomography monitors cerebrospinal fluid dynamics and glymphatic function.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Investigating the timing behavior of compton scattering in BGO for time-of-flight PET.

Physics in medicine and biology·2026
Same author

Voxel-based dosimetry for predicting treatment response to transarterial radioembolization in hepatocellular carcinoma: significance of intratumoral dose distribution.

EJNMMI physics·2025
Same journal

Current Status of PSMA-Targeted Agents Based on Small Molecules for Prostate Cancer in Preclinical Studies.

Nuclear medicine and molecular imaging·2026
Same journal

Fibroblast Activation Protein-Targeted SPECT Imaging Using <sup>99m</sup>Tc: A Comprehensive Review.

Nuclear medicine and molecular imaging·2026
Same journal

The 2026 Special Issue on Radiopharmaceuticals: from Molecular Design to Clinical Translation.

Nuclear medicine and molecular imaging·2026
Same journal

Feasibility of [<sup>99m</sup>Tc]Tc-Mannosylated Human Serum Albumin for Lymphoscintigraphy: A Phase 1/2 Clinical Trial.

Nuclear medicine and molecular imaging·2026
Same journal

Automated Synthesis of Radiopharmaceuticals: Technology, Applications, and Regulatory Perspectives.

Nuclear medicine and molecular imaging·2026
Same journal

Development of Antibody and Antibody Fragment-Based Radiopharmaceuticals for Cancer Imaging and Therapy.

Nuclear medicine and molecular imaging·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 27, 2025

Transient Optical Clearing Using Absorbing Molecules for Ex Vivo and In Vivo Imaging
07:15

Transient Optical Clearing Using Absorbing Molecules for Ex Vivo and In Vivo Imaging

Published on: July 11, 2025

1.4K

Self-supervised PET Denoising.

Si Young Yie1,2, Seung Kwan Kang1,3, Donghwi Hwang1,3

  • 1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 103 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080 South Korea.

Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
|December 7, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Self-supervised deep learning methods, noise2noise (N2N) and noiser2noise (Nr2N), show promise for positron emission tomography (PET) image denoising. These methods offer comparable or superior results to noise2clean (N2C), potentially reducing scan time or radiation dose.

Keywords:
Artificial neural networkDeep learningDenoising filterPositron emission tomography (PET)

More Related Videos

A Swin Transformer-Based Model for Thyroid Nodule Detection in Ultrasound Images
04:23

A Swin Transformer-Based Model for Thyroid Nodule Detection in Ultrasound Images

Published on: April 21, 2023

2.1K
Author Spotlight: Enhancement of Salient Object Detection for Smart Grid Applications
03:31

Author Spotlight: Enhancement of Salient Object Detection for Smart Grid Applications

Published on: December 15, 2023

823

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 27, 2025

Transient Optical Clearing Using Absorbing Molecules for Ex Vivo and In Vivo Imaging
07:15

Transient Optical Clearing Using Absorbing Molecules for Ex Vivo and In Vivo Imaging

Published on: July 11, 2025

1.4K
A Swin Transformer-Based Model for Thyroid Nodule Detection in Ultrasound Images
04:23

A Swin Transformer-Based Model for Thyroid Nodule Detection in Ultrasound Images

Published on: April 21, 2023

2.1K
Author Spotlight: Enhancement of Salient Object Detection for Smart Grid Applications
03:31

Author Spotlight: Enhancement of Salient Object Detection for Smart Grid Applications

Published on: December 15, 2023

823

Area of Science:

  • Medical Imaging
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Radiology

Background:

  • Deep learning-based image denoising is crucial for medical imaging.
  • Conventional methods often require clean training data (noise2clean).
  • Self-supervised learning offers an alternative approach.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate self-supervised denoising methods (noise2noise, noiser2noise) for PET imaging.
  • To compare their performance against a supervised method (noise2clean).
  • To assess feasibility using real PET data.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of 14 patients' 18F-FDG brain PET/CT scans.
  • Generation of noisy PET data from list-mode data at various durations (10s, 40s, 300s).
  • U-Net architecture used for training and testing denoising models.

Main Results:

  • All tested methods (N2C, N2N, Nr2N) effectively denoised PET images.
  • N2N achieved peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) comparable to N2C.
  • Nr2N demonstrated higher structural similarity index measure (SSIM) than N2N.
  • N2N produced denoised images with better contrast and similarity to filtered reference images.

Conclusions:

  • Self-supervised denoising methods are effective for PET imaging.
  • These techniques can potentially reduce PET scan duration or radiation exposure.
  • N2N and Nr2N present viable alternatives to supervised denoising in PET.