Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 19, 2026
Tracking the Mammary Architectural Features and Detecting Breast Cancer with Magnetic Resonance Diffusion Tensor Imaging
Published on: December 15, 2014
Comparison Between Diffusion-Weighted MRI and 123 I-mIBG Uptake in Primary High-Risk Neuroblastoma
Laura Privitera1, Patrick W Hales2, Layla Musleh1
1Department of Specialist Neonatal and Paediatric Surgery, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK.
Background:
High-risk neuroblastoma (HR-NB) has a variable response to preoperative chemotherapy. It is not possible to differentiate viable vs. nonviable residual tumor before surgery.
Purpose:
To explore the association between apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values from diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI), 123 I-meta-iodobenzyl-guanidine (123 I-mIBG) uptake, and histology before and after chemotherapy.
Study Type:
Retrospective.
Subjects:
Forty patients with HR-NB.
Field Strength/Sequence:
1.5T axial DW-MRI (b = 0,1000 s/mm2 ) and T2 -weighted sequences. 123 I-mIBG scintigraphy planar imaging (all patients), with additional 123 I-mIBG single-photon emission computed tomography / computerized tomography (SPECT/CT) imaging (15 patients).
Assessment:
ADC maps and 123 I-mIBG SPECT/CT images were coregistered to the T2 -weighted images. 123 I-mIBG uptake was normalized with a tumor-to-liver count ratio (TLCR). Regions of interest (ROIs) for primary tumor volume and different intratumor subregions were drawn. The lower quartile ADC value (ADC25prc ) was used over the entire tumor volume and the overall level of 123 I-mIBG uptake was graded into avidity groups.
Statistical Tests:
Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and linear regression were used to compare ADC and MIBG values before and after treatment. Threshold values to classify tumors as viable/necrotic were obtained using ROC analysis of ADC and TLCR values.
Results:
No significant difference in whole-tumor ADC25prc values were found between different 123 I-mIBG avidity groups pre- (P = 0.31) or postchemotherapy (P = 0.35). In the "intratumor" analysis, 5/15 patients (prechemotherapy) and 0/14 patients (postchemotherapy) showed a significant correlation between ADC and TLCR values (P < 0.05). Increased tumor shrinkage was associated with lower pretreatment tumor ADC25prc values (P < 0.001); no association was found with pretreatment 123 I-mIBG avidity (P = 0.17). Completely nonviable tumors had significantly lower postchemotherapy ADC25prc values than tumors with >10% viable tumor (P < 0.05). Both pre- and posttreatment TLCR values were significantly higher in patients with >50% viable tumor than those with 10-50% viable tumor (P < 0.05). DATA CONCLUSION: 123 I-mIBG avidity and ADC values are complementary noninvasive biomarkers of therapeutic response in HR-NB.
Level Of Evidence:
4.
Technical Efficacy Stage:
3.
