Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Probability Distributions01:32

Probability Distributions

11.1K
 The probability of a random variable x  is the likelihood of its occurrence. A probability distribution represents the probabilities of a random variable using a formula, graph, or table. There are two types of probability distribution– discrete probability distribution and continuous probability distribution.
A discrete probability distribution is a probability distribution of discrete random variables. It can be categorized into binomial probability distribution and Poisson...
11.1K
Uniform Distribution01:19

Uniform Distribution

5.7K
The uniform distribution is a continuous probability distribution of events with an equal probability of occurrence. This distribution is rectangular.
Two essential properties of this distribution are
5.7K
Variance01:15

Variance

11.4K
The deviations show how spread out the data are about the mean. A positive deviation occurs when the data value exceeds the mean, whereas a negative deviation occurs when the data value is less than the mean. If the deviations are added, the sum is always zero. So one cannot simply add the deviations to get the data spread. By squaring the deviations, the numbers are made positive; thus, their sum will also be positive.
The standard deviation measures the spread in the same units as the data....
11.4K
Expected Value01:15

Expected Value

6.8K
The expected value is known as the "long-term" average or mean. This means that over the long term of experimenting over and over, you would expect this average. The expected average is represented by the symbol μ. It is calculated as follows:
6.8K
Unusual Results01:16

Unusual Results

3.6K
Unusual results are those that have a very low chance of occurring. Unusual results can be identified using probabilities and the range rule of thumb. In problems involving probability, unusual results can be observed in 2 instances – an unusually high number of successes or an unusually low number of successes.
According to the range rule of thumb, any value above or below two standard deviations, 2σ  from the mean, μ  is considered unusual.
Maximum unusual value =...
3.6K
Random Variables01:09

Random Variables

16.8K
A random variable is a single numerical value that indicates the outcome of a procedure. The concept of random variables is fundamental to the probability theory and was introduced by a Russian mathematician, Pafnuty Chebyshev, in the mid-nineteenth century.
Uppercase letters such as X or Y denote a random variable. Lowercase letters like x or y denote the value of a random variable. If X is a random variable, then X is written in words, and x is given as a number.
For example, let X = the...
16.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

[Arthroscopic reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligament with preservation of the remnant bundle].

Zhongguo gu shang = China journal of orthopaedics and traumatology·2013
Same author

[Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with tendon graft enveloped by preserved remnants].

Zhongguo gu shang = China journal of orthopaedics and traumatology·2013
Same author

Genetic and molecular biological characterization of two homologous cheR genes from Leptospira interrogans.

Acta biochimica et biophysica Sinica·2013
Same author

Upregulation of glycoprotein nonmetastatic B by colony-stimulating factor-1 and epithelial cell adhesion molecule in hepatocellular carcinoma cells.

Oncology research·2013
Same author

Effect of implantation of biodegradable magnesium alloy on BMP-2 expression in bone of ovariectomized osteoporosis rats.

Materials science & engineering. C, Materials for biological applications·2013
Same author

[Texture variation of CC 5052 aluminum alloy slab from surface to center layer by XRD].

Guang pu xue yu guang pu fen xi = Guang pu·2013
Same journal

Research on a Regional Availability Evaluation Model for Road-Area High-Entropy Energy Based on Synergy Factors.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Atmospheric Turbulence Channel Modeling and Performance Analysis of a CO-ZP-OFDM Coherent Optical Communication System for UAV Air-to-Ground Scenarios.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Information Geometry and Asymptotic Theory for SMML Estimators.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Correlation Entropy and Power-Law Kinetics.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Research on the Contagion of Systemic Financial Risk Under the Impact of Climate Risks-From the Perspective of Complex Networks and Machine Learning.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

The Statistical-Mechanical Meaning of the Wave Function of Quantum Mechanics.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 27, 2025

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.4K

Maximum Varma Entropy Distribution with Conditional Value at Risk Constraints.

Chang Liu1, Chuo Chang2, Zhe Chang3,4

  • 1Institute of Chinese Finance Studies, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu 611130, China.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)
|December 8, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study replaces variance with Conditional Value at Risk (CVaR) constraints in portfolio optimization. The maximum entropy approach with CVaR constraints reveals a power-law distribution for portfolio returns, offering a new risk management perspective.

Keywords:
Varma entropyinvestment riskmaximum entropyportfolio selectionpower lawvalue at risk

More Related Videos

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

12.3K
Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

10.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 27, 2025

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.4K
Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

12.3K
Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

10.6K

Area of Science:

  • Quantitative Finance
  • Financial Risk Management
  • Information Theory

Background:

  • Markowitz's mean-variance model, a foundational portfolio selection tool, assumes normal return distributions.
  • Empirical financial data reveals power-law tail behavior, deviating from the log-normal distribution assumption.
  • Traditional maximum entropy methods often rely on mean and variance constraints, which may not fully capture market realities.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate portfolio return distributions using maximum entropy with Conditional Value at Risk (CVaR) constraints.
  • To replace the conventional variance constraint with CVaR in portfolio entropy maximization.
  • To analyze the resulting distribution and the relationship between Lagrangian multipliers and CVaR constraints.

Main Methods:

  • Application of the maximum entropy method to portfolio optimization.
  • Incorporation of Conditional Value at Risk (CVaR) as a constraint, replacing variance.
  • Derivation of algebraic relations between Lagrangian multipliers and CVaR constraints.

Main Results:

  • The maximum entropy distribution under CVaR constraints exhibits a power-law characteristic.
  • Explicit algebraic relationships are established between Lagrangian multipliers and the imposed CVaR constraints.
  • Lagrangian multipliers are shown to be precisely determined by the CVaR constraints.

Conclusions:

  • Conditional Value at Risk constraints provide a more suitable framework for maximizing portfolio entropy compared to variance.
  • The derived power-law distribution offers a more realistic model for financial market returns.
  • This approach enhances the understanding and management of portfolio risk through a robust theoretical framework.