Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

The Uncertainty Principle04:08

The Uncertainty Principle

30.2K
Werner Heisenberg considered the limits of how accurately one can measure properties of an electron or other microscopic particles. He determined that there is a fundamental limit to how accurately one can measure both a particle’s position and its momentum simultaneously. The more accurate the measurement of the momentum of a particle is known, the less accurate the position at that time is known and vice versa. This is what is now called the Heisenberg uncertainty principle. He...
30.2K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error01:10

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

1.1K
The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this...
1.1K
Uncertainty: Overview00:59

Uncertainty: Overview

1.3K
In analytical chemistry, we often perform repetitive measurements to detect and minimize inaccuracies caused by both determinate and indeterminate errors. Despite the cares we take, the presence of random errors means that repeated measurements almost never have exactly the same magnitude. The collective difference between these measurements - observed values - and the estimated or expected value is called uncertainty. Uncertainty is conventionally written after the estimated or expected value.
1.3K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error00:59

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

1.5K
An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...
1.5K
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

98.4K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. 
98.4K
Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments02:46

Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments

49.2K
Counting is the type of measurement that is free from uncertainty, provided the number of objects being counted does not change during the process. Such measurements result in exact numbers. By counting the eggs in a carton, for instance, one can determine exactly how many eggs are there in the carton. Similarly, the numbers of defined quantities are also exact. For example, 1 foot is exactly 12 inches, 1 inch is exactly 2.54 centimeters, and 1 gram is exactly 0.001 kilograms. Quantities...
49.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Research Pathways for Automotive Exhaust Catalysts during the Transition to Electric Mobility.

Environmental science & technology·2026
Same author

Dual Mobility versus Conventional Total Hip Arthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fractures: A Multicenter Propensity-Matched Study on Dislocation Risk.

The Journal of arthroplasty·2026
Same author

Toxicity Comparison between a Four-Week Moderate Hypofractionation and a Six-Week Conventional Fractionation in the Post-Prostatectomy Salvage Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer.

Clinical genitourinary cancer·2025
Same author

Metal Precursor Composition Is Key in the Synthesis of Pd Single Atom Catalysts.

The journal of physical chemistry letters·2025
Same author

Deintensification of radiation dose to 20 Gy for conjunctival mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma.

Leukemia & lymphoma·2025
Same author

The value of magnetic resonance imaging in predicting vesicovaginal fistula in cervical cancer with bladder invasion treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy.

Gynecologic oncology·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 27, 2025

Quantum State Engineering of Light with Continuous-wave Optical Parametric Oscillators
09:23

Quantum State Engineering of Light with Continuous-wave Optical Parametric Oscillators

Published on: May 30, 2014

14.8K

Uncertainty Relation for Errors Focusing on General POVM Measurements with an Example of Two-State Quantum Systems.

Jaeha Lee1, Izumi Tsutsui2

  • 1Institute of Industrial Science, The University of Tokyo, Chiba 277-8574, Japan.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)
|December 8, 2020
PubMed
Summary

A new quantum measurement uncertainty relation is introduced, offering operational bounds beyond the standard Heisenberg limit for position-momentum measurements. This relation provides tighter constraints for two-state quantum systems and respects the core principles of quantum mechanics.

Keywords:
quantum foundationsquantum measurementuncertainty relation

More Related Videos

Measurement of Quantum Interference in a Silicon Ring Resonator Photon Source
12:19

Measurement of Quantum Interference in a Silicon Ring Resonator Photon Source

Published on: April 4, 2017

8.7K
Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements
10:22

Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements

Published on: September 7, 2019

8.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 27, 2025

Quantum State Engineering of Light with Continuous-wave Optical Parametric Oscillators
09:23

Quantum State Engineering of Light with Continuous-wave Optical Parametric Oscillators

Published on: May 30, 2014

14.8K
Measurement of Quantum Interference in a Silicon Ring Resonator Photon Source
12:19

Measurement of Quantum Interference in a Silicon Ring Resonator Photon Source

Published on: April 4, 2017

8.7K
Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements
10:22

Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements

Published on: September 7, 2019

8.6K

Area of Science:

  • Quantum Mechanics
  • Quantum Information Theory
  • Measurement Theory

Background:

  • The Heisenberg uncertainty principle is fundamental to quantum mechanics.
  • Existing uncertainty relations often focus on state preparations rather than measurement errors.
  • Operational uncertainty relations are crucial for practical quantum technologies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present a novel, geometrically formulated uncertainty relation for general quantum measurement errors.
  • To demonstrate the operational nature and tangible relevance of the new relation.
  • To explore its implications for specific quantum systems and compare it with existing relations.

Main Methods:

  • Formulation of a new uncertainty relation using geometric concepts for measurement maps.
  • Analysis of the relation in the context of the Kolmogorovian measure-theoretic formalism of probability.
  • Representation of quantum measurements using positive-operator valued measures (POVMs).

Main Results:

  • The novel relation violates the naive bound of ℏ/2 for position-momentum measurements.
  • It provides tighter bounds for measurements on two-state quantum systems, with equality for pure states.
  • The standard Kennard-Robertson uncertainty relation emerges as a special case.

Conclusions:

  • The new uncertainty relation offers a more complete and operational description of quantum measurement limitations.
  • It respects Heisenberg's uncertainty principle while extending its applicability.
  • The findings have implications for the precision of quantum measurements and the development of quantum technologies.