Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 27, 2025

Quantification of Information Encoded by Gene Expression Levels During Lifespan Modulation Under Broad-range Dietary Restriction in C. elegans
Published on: August 16, 2017
A Comparison of Variational Bounds for the Information Bottleneck Functional
Bernhard C Geiger1, Ian S Fischer2
1Know-Center GmbH, Inffeldgasse 13/6, 8010 Graz, Austria.
This study compares variational bounds for information bottleneck (IB) and conditional entropy bottleneck (CEB) functionals. It finds no general ordering between bounds, suggesting CEB bounds may be more optimizable for improved generalization and robustness.
Area of Science:
- Machine Learning
- Information Theory
- Optimization
Background:
- The Information Bottleneck (IB) and Conditional Entropy Bottleneck (CEB) are key information-theoretic frameworks for understanding representation learning.
- Variational bounds for IB and CEB functionals have been proposed, with CEB bounds empirically linked to better generalization and adversarial robustness.
- The theoretical relationship and practical implications of optimizing these bounds remain an active area of research.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the relationship between variational bounds for the Information Bottleneck (IB) and Conditional Entropy Bottleneck (CEB) functionals.
- To understand why optimizing CEB bounds empirically yields superior generalization and adversarial robustness compared to IB bounds.
- To elucidate the conditions under which an ordering between these variational bounds can be established.
Main Methods:
- Relating the variational bounds proposed by Alemi et al. (2017) for IB and Fischer (2020) for CEB.
- Analyzing the general setting to determine if a consistent ordering exists between the variational bounds.
- Investigating the effect of restricting feasible sets on the optimization of these bounds.
Main Results:
- In the most general setting, no definitive ordering can be established between the variational bounds of the IB and CEB functionals.
- An ordering between the bounds can be enforced by restricting the feasible sets over which the optimization occurs.
- The absence of a general ordering suggests the CEB variational bound may be inherently more amenable to optimization or a valuable cost function independently.
Conclusions:
- The empirical success of CEB bounds in improving generalization and robustness might stem from their optimization properties rather than a strict theoretical hierarchy over IB bounds.
- Future research should explore the specific characteristics of the feasible sets that enable ordering and further investigate the CEB bound as a standalone optimization objective.
- This work provides theoretical insights into the practical performance differences observed when optimizing IB and CEB variational bounds in machine learning tasks.
Related Concept Videos
The Squeeze Theorem
BIBO stability of continuous and discrete -time systems
To determine the BIBO stability, the convolution integral is utilized when a bounded continuous-time input is applied to a Linear Time-Invariant (LTI) system....
Accuracy, limits, and approximation
Accuracy is defined as the closeness of the measured value to the true or actual value. In engineering mechanics, repeated measurements are taken during theoretical or experimental analyses to ensure that the result is precise and accurate.
The accuracy of any solution is based on the...
Types of Limits II
Chebyshev's Theorem to Interpret Standard Deviation
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving
In individual population analyses, different algorithms are employed, such as Cauchy's method, which uses a...

