Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 26, 2025

Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Skeletal Muscle Disease
Published on: December 18, 2016
Inter- and intra-scanner variations in four magnetic resonance imaging image quality parameters
Juha I Peltonen1, Teemu Mäkelä1,2, Lauri Lehmonen1,2
1University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, HUS Medical Imaging Center, Radiology, Helsinki, Finland.
Daily magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) quality assurance (QA) scans reveal significant differences in scanner performance and image quality parameters between MRI scanners. Establishing scanner-specific thresholds can improve automatic detection of abnormal QA images.
Area of Science:
- Medical Imaging
- Radiology
- Quality Assurance
Background:
- Quality assurance (QA) protocols for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanners often include phantom checks to ensure equipment constancy.
- Daily QA images offer potential for studying scanner baseline performance and image quality variations.
- Automatic error detection can be implemented with established baselines and variation profiles.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate inter-scanner variability in MRI image quality parameters.
- To establish baseline performance and variation profiles for MRI scanners.
- To evaluate the efficacy of automatic detection of abnormal QA images compared to human observation.
Main Methods:
- Monitored four image quality parameters (SNR, uniformity, ghosting, geometrical distortions) across 17 MRI scanners for six months.
- Determined baseline levels and normal variation ranges for each parameter.
- Compared automatic abnormal image detection with visual assessment by human observers.
Main Results:
- Significant inter-scanner differences were observed in all QA parameters.
- Some QA results exceeded established tolerances, indicating potential equipment issues.
- No clear relationship was found between scanner field strength or mobility and QA results.
Conclusions:
- MRI scanner baseline performance and image quality parameter variations differ substantially between units.
- Scanner-specific error thresholds, derived from parameter means and standard deviations, are effective for detecting abnormal QA images.
- Automatic analysis of daily QA images can enhance MRI quality control.
Related Concept Videos
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Imaging Studies IV: Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System IV: CMRI
NMR Spectrometers: Resolution and Error Correction

