Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 26, 2025

A Novel Digital Platform for a Monitored Home-based Cardiac Rehabilitation Program
Published on: April 19, 2019
An investigation into whether cardiac risk stratification protocols actually predict complications in cardiac
Felipe Ribeiro1, Carolina Takahashi1, Lais Manata Vanzella1
1Physiotherapy Department, School of Sciences and Technologies, São Paulo State University - UNESP, Presidente Prudente, São Paulo, Brazil.
Insights
The American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation (AACVPR) protocol showed a significant link between risk classes and minor complications in cardiac rehab. However, its low accuracy indicates it is not effective for this purpose.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Rehabilitation Medicine
- Clinical Risk Stratification
Background:
- Cardiovascular rehabilitation programs aim to manage patients with cardiovascular disease.
- Effective risk stratification is crucial for patient safety during rehabilitation.
- Evaluating existing protocols for their ability to predict minor complications is essential.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the efficacy of seven cardiac risk stratification protocols in predicting simple complications during cardiovascular rehabilitation.
- To determine if protocols like AACVPR, ACSM, and others can identify patients at risk for adverse events.
Main Methods:
- An observational longitudinal cohort study was conducted in an outpatient cardiovascular rehabilitation clinic.
- Seventy-six patients with cardiovascular disease or risk factors were analyzed.
- The chi-square test was used to assess the relationship between risk classes and complications, followed by sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy calculations.
Main Results:
- The American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation (AACVPR) protocol demonstrated a statistically significant relationship (P=0.046) between risk classes and simple complications.
- However, the AACVPR protocol yielded low sensitivity (0.53), specificity (0.52), and accuracy (0.53).
- All other evaluated protocols (ACSM, SBC, AHA, Pashkow, SFC, SSC) showed no statistically significant relationship with complications.
Conclusions:
- While the AACVPR protocol showed a significant association, its poor performance metrics (sensitivity, specificity, accuracy) render it unsuitable for predicting simple complications in cardiovascular rehabilitation.
- Further research may be needed to develop or refine risk stratification tools for this clinical setting.
Objectives:
This study evaluated the capacity of cardiac risk stratification protocols on simple complications that occur during activities of a cardiovascular rehabilitation program.
Design:
Observational longitudinal cohort study.
Setting:
Outpatient clinic of cardiovascular rehabilitation.
Subject:
Patients diagnosed with cardiovascular disease and/or risk factors.
Interventions:
Not applicable.
Main Measures:
The relationship between the cardiac risk classes of seven risk stratification protocols and the occurrence of simple complications (such angina, abnormal changes in blood pressure, arrhythmias, fatigue, muscle pain, pallor) was assessed using the chi-square test, and when statistical significance was observed, sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were determined.
Results:
About 76 patients were analyzed. The American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation (AACVPR) protocol showed a statistically significant relationship between simple complications and cardiac risk classes (P-value = 0.046), however the results of sensitivity (0.53), specificity (0.52), and accuracy (0.53) were not significant. The other protocols analyzed were not significant: American College of Sports Medicine (P-value = 0.801), Brazilian Society of Cardiology (P-value = 0.734), American Heart Association (P-value = 0.957), Pashkow (P-value = 0.790), Society French Cardiology (P-value = 0.314), and Spanish Society of Cardiology (P-value = 0.078).
Conclusion:
The AACVPR protocol showed a significant relationship between the risk classes and the occurrence of simple complications, however, the low values obtained for sensitivity, specificity and accuracy show that it is not useful for this purpose.
Clinical Trials Registration:
NCT03446742.
More Related Videos
05:16Cutoff Value of Phase Angle by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis at Admission as a Prognostic Factor in Patients with Acute Heart Failure
Published on: June 10, 2025
12:45Benefits of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in an Asynchronous Heart Failure Model Induced by Left Bundle Branch Ablation and Rapid Pacing
Published on: December 11, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation
Blood Studies for Cardiovascular System II: CRP, Hcy, and Cardiac Natriuretic Peptide Markers
These markers indicate stress or strain on the heart muscle:
Natriuretic Peptides (BNP)
Cardiac myocytes produce these hormones in response to ventricular stretching...
Cardiomyopathy IV: Restrictive Cardiomyopathy
Dysrhythmias V: Evaluating Dysrhythmias
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies