Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 26, 2025

Author Spotlight: Developing Low-Tech Balance Assessment Methods for Broad-Spectrum Healthcare Applications
Published on: September 1, 2023
Worldwide survey on laboratory testing of vestibular function.
Michael Strupp1, Joy Grimberg1, Julian Teufel1
1Department of Neurology and German Center for Vertigo and Balance Disorders (MS, JT), Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich, Campus Grosshadern, Germany; Institute for Medical Information Processing (JG, EG), Biometrics and Epidemiology and German Center for Vertigo and Balance Disorders, Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich, Germany; Department of Surgical Sciences (GL), Uppsala University, Sweden; and Department of Otolaryngology (HK), Maastricht University Medical Centre, The Netherlands.
Vestibular system testing shows wide variations in normal and abnormal values globally. Standardization is needed for accurate diagnosis and research in vestibular disorders.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Otolaryngology
- Audiology
Background:
- Peripheral vestibular system function can be quantified using tests like video head impulse test (vHIT), caloric irrigation, cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (cVEMP), and ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (oVEMP).
- Existing methods assess semicircular canals (vHIT, caloric irrigation), sacculus (cVEMP), and utriculus (oVEMP).
- Lack of consensus on normal and pathological values hinders consistent clinical interpretation and research.
Purpose of the Study:
- To conduct a worldwide survey to identify current reference and cutoff values used for vestibular function tests.
- To highlight the variability in these values across different international centers.
- To advocate for standardization in vestibular testing protocols and interpretation.
Main Methods:
- A web-based, standardized survey questionnaire was distributed to collect data on reference and cutoff values.
- Data were collected from 38 participating centers across multiple continents (excluding Africa).
- The survey focused on values for vHIT, caloric irrigation, and cVEMP.
Main Results:
- Significant variability was observed in reference values for vHIT gain, caloric irrigation slow phase velocity, and cVEMP amplitude.
- Reported cutoff values for diagnosing unilateral and bilateral vestibulopathy also showed considerable variation.
- Specific ranges for vHIT side difference, caloric irrigation side difference, and cVEMP asymmetry were documented, revealing inconsistencies.
Conclusions:
- The global survey revealed substantial variability in reference and pathological cutoff values for vestibular testing.
- Standardization of data acquisition and agreement on specific values are crucial.
- Standardization will enhance the quality of vestibular testing and the reliability of clinical and scientific outcomes.
Related Concept Videos
The Vestibular System
Equilibrium and Balance

