Response to "Molecular-level understanding of biological energy coupling and transduction: Response to "Chemiosmotic...

The most recent contribution by Sunil Nath in these pages is, mostly, a repetition of his previous claims regarding failures of the chemiosmotic hypotheses, supplemented with some fresh misunderstandings of the points I had sought to clarify in my previous critique⁠. Considerable portions rehash 50-60 years-old controversies, with no apparent understanding that the current chemiosmotic hypothesis, while birthed by Mitchell, differs from Mitchell's details in many respects. As such, Nath has devoted much time dealing with a few errors (or wrong hypotheses) by Mitchell (in a few places I would almost venture to say "typographical mistakes in typesetting") and presents the ensuing conclusions as "refutations" of the chemiosmotic paradigm, completely neglecting that such details (such as the precise H⁺/ATP or H⁺:O ratios) are completely irrelevant to the reality (or not) of an electron-transport chain that uses the free energy liberated by electron-transfer to remove H⁺ from a compartment, to which it returns through and ATP synthase which uses the energy in that spontaneous return to drive ATP synthesis. The thermodynamical mistakes and misunderstandings of the relevant literature present in Nath's new contribution are so numerous, though, that I feel forced to call the attention of the readers of "Biophysical Chemistry" to them.