Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 26, 2025

Biosensor-based High Throughput Biopanning and Bioinformatics Analysis Strategy for the Global Validation of Drug-protein Interactions
Published on: December 1, 2020
Concordance testing between Powerplex ESI 16 Fast System and VeriFiler Express
Hagit Schayek1, Ortal Waiskopf2, Ksenia Rashkovski1
1DNA Database Laboratory, Division of Identification and Forensic Science (DIFS), Israel Police, Jerusalem, Israel.
Different DNA STR kits can produce varying results for the same genetic loci, impacting database accuracy. Laboratories must account for these inconsistencies when using new STR kits like VeriFiler™ Express to ensure reliable DNA profile analysis.
Area of Science:
- Forensic Science
- Genetics
- Molecular Biology
Background:
- Short tandem repeat (STR) kits are crucial for DNA profiling in forensic science.
- Variations in allele calls between different STR kits can hinder data sharing and database comparisons.
- Expanding analyzed loci is necessary for handling degraded samples, low DNA quantities, and complex mixtures.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare genotyping data between the VeriFiler™ Express and Powerplex™ ESI FAST STR kits.
- To quantify the discordance rates and types of mismatches observed between the two kits.
- To highlight the importance of addressing inter-kit variability in DNA analysis.
Main Methods:
- Genotyping of 1568 DNA samples using both VeriFiler™ Express and Powerplex™ ESI FAST kits.
- Comparative analysis of allele data generated by the two STR kits.
- Identification and categorization of discordant genotyping results.
Main Results:
- A discordance rate of 1.27% was observed between the VeriFiler™ Express and Powerplex™ ESI FAST kits.
- Allele dropout mismatch occurred in 0.89% of samples, and additional fixed-size third alleles in 0.38%.
- Observed discordance rates exceeded previously reported rates for the VeriFiler™ Express kit.
Conclusions:
- Significant inter-kit variability exists in STR genotyping, necessitating careful validation.
- DNA laboratories and genetic-match search systems must consider these inconsistencies for accurate profile interpretation.
- Standardization or robust cross-validation protocols are essential for reliable DNA database management and casework.
More Related Videos
07:02A Computerized Test Battery to Study Pharmacodynamic Effects on the Central Nervous System of Cholinergic Drugs in Early Phase Drug Development
Published on: February 11, 2019
11:08Proofreading and DNA Repair Assay Using Single Nucleotide Extension and MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry Analysis
Published on: June 19, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Multiple Comparison Tests
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
Compacting Factor test
The procedure begins by placing concrete into the upper hopper without any compaction. Once filled, the bottom door of this hopper is opened,...
Capillary Electrophoresis: Instrumentation
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test
Power Factor Correction
Fisher's Exact Test