Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Steps in Outbreak Investigation01:18

Steps in Outbreak Investigation

364
In the ever-evolving field of public health, statistical analysis serves as a cornerstone for understanding and managing disease outbreaks. By leveraging various statistical tools, health professionals can predict potential outbreaks, analyze ongoing situations, and devise effective responses to mitigate impact. For that to happen, there are a few possible stages of the analysis:
364
Causality in Epidemiology01:21

Causality in Epidemiology

1.3K
Causality or causation is a fundamental concept in epidemiology, vital for understanding the relationships between various factors and health outcomes. Despite its importance, there's no single, universally accepted definition of causality within the discipline. Drawing from a systematic review, causality in epidemiology encompasses several definitions, including production, necessary and sufficient, sufficient-component, counterfactual, and probabilistic models. Each has its strengths and...
1.3K
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

999
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
999
Viral Mutations00:36

Viral Mutations

37.9K
A mutation is a change in the sequence of bases of DNA or RNA in a genome. Some mutations occur during replication of the genome due to errors made by the polymerase enzymes that replicate DNA or RNA. Unlike DNA polymerase, RNA polymerase is prone to errors because it is not capable of “proofreading” its work. Viruses with RNA-based genomes, like HIV, therefore accrue mutations faster than viruses with DNA-based genomes. Because mutation and recombination provide the raw material...
37.9K
Viral Recombination00:57

Viral Recombination

24.5K
Cells are sometimes infected by more than one virus at once. When two viruses disassemble to expose their genomes for replication in the same cell, similar regions of their genomes can pair together and exchange sequences in a process called recombination. Alternatively, viruses with segmented genomes can swap segments in a process called reassortment.
24.5K
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies01:27

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

388
Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This...
388

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Exploring Information Needs of Patients With Cancer and Family Caregivers: A Descriptive and Network Analysis of End-of-Life Inquiries.

Oncology nursing forum·2026
Same author

Patient-Provider Discussions About Online Health Information in the Health Information National Trends Survey.

Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education·2026
Same author

How Hospice and Palliative Care Are Portrayed in Artificial Intelligence-Generated Images: A Content Analysis.

Journal of palliative medicine·2026
Same author

Cancer screening information-seeking before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Preventive oncology & epidemiology·2026
Same author

Advancing rural cancer control: A portfolio analysis of research funded by the National Cancer Institute, 2016-2024.

The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association·2026
Same author

Health behaviors, and beliefs about health behaviors and cancer risk, among US cancer survivors: a HINTS-SEER study.

Cancer survivorship research & care·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 25, 2025

Author Spotlight: Advancements in Multiplex Detection of Respiratory Viruses
03:53

Author Spotlight: Advancements in Multiplex Detection of Respiratory Viruses

Published on: November 10, 2023

1.6K

The COVID-19 Misinfodemic: Moving Beyond Fact-Checking.

Wen-Ying Sylvia Chou1, Anna Gaysynsky2, Robin C Vanderpool1

  • 1Health Communication and Informatics Research Branch, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA.

Health Education & Behavior : the Official Publication of the Society for Public Health Education
|December 16, 2020
PubMed
Summary

Fact-checking COVID-19 misinformation is insufficient. Addressing emotions, distrust, and biases is crucial for mitigating health misinformation and its impact on public health efforts.

Keywords:
health communicationinfectious diseasemisinformationsocial media

More Related Videos

Live Imaging and Quantification of Viral Infection in K18 hACE2 Transgenic Mice Using Reporter-Expressing Recombinant SARS-CoV-2
08:41

Live Imaging and Quantification of Viral Infection in K18 hACE2 Transgenic Mice Using Reporter-Expressing Recombinant SARS-CoV-2

Published on: November 5, 2021

3.1K
Dynamic Monitoring of Seroconversion using a Multianalyte Immunobead Assay for Covid-19
08:48

Dynamic Monitoring of Seroconversion using a Multianalyte Immunobead Assay for Covid-19

Published on: February 16, 2022

3.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 25, 2025

Author Spotlight: Advancements in Multiplex Detection of Respiratory Viruses
03:53

Author Spotlight: Advancements in Multiplex Detection of Respiratory Viruses

Published on: November 10, 2023

1.6K
Live Imaging and Quantification of Viral Infection in K18 hACE2 Transgenic Mice Using Reporter-Expressing Recombinant SARS-CoV-2
08:41

Live Imaging and Quantification of Viral Infection in K18 hACE2 Transgenic Mice Using Reporter-Expressing Recombinant SARS-CoV-2

Published on: November 5, 2021

3.1K
Dynamic Monitoring of Seroconversion using a Multianalyte Immunobead Assay for Covid-19
08:48

Dynamic Monitoring of Seroconversion using a Multianalyte Immunobead Assay for Covid-19

Published on: February 16, 2022

3.2K

Area of Science:

  • Public Health
  • Health Communication
  • Psychology

Background:

  • Online misinformation regarding COVID-19 has significantly hindered public health initiatives.
  • Current strategies primarily focus on identifying and correcting false information on social media.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the effectiveness of current fact-checking strategies against COVID-19 misinformation.
  • To explore underlying factors contributing to misinformation acceptance and sharing.
  • To propose additional measures beyond fact-checking to mitigate misinformation's impact.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of health communication and psychology research.
  • Analysis of limitations in current fact-checking approaches.
  • Identification of psychological and social drivers of misinformation.

Main Results:

  • Fact-checking is a necessary but insufficient method for combating health misinformation.
  • Misinformation exposure has lasting effects that are difficult to fully reverse through correction.
  • Factors like emotions, distrust, cognitive biases, racism, and xenophobia increase vulnerability and reduce susceptibility to correction.

Conclusions:

  • Current fact-checking efforts alone are inadequate to counter COVID-19 misinformation effectively.
  • A multi-faceted approach is needed, addressing the psychological and social determinants of misinformation.
  • Additional strategies beyond correction are required to mitigate the pervasive effects of health misinformation.