Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Comparing Copy Number Variations and SNPs02:26

Comparing Copy Number Variations and SNPs

18.4K
Sequencing of the human genome has opened up several best-kept secrets of the genome. Scientists have identified thousands of genome variations that exist within a population. These variations can be a single nucleotide or a larger chromosomal variation.
Copy number variations or CNVs are the structural variations that cover more than 1kb of DNA sequence. The single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), on the other hand, is a single nucleotide change or a point mutation that is found in more than 1%...
18.4K
Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms-SNPs01:05

Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms-SNPs

17.4K
A single nucleotide polymorphism or SNP is a single nucleotide variation at a specific genomic position in a large population. It is the most prevalent type of sequence variation found in the human genome. Point mutations that occur in more than 1% of the population qualify as SNPs. These are present once every 1000 nucleotides on an average in the human genome. Replacement of a purine with another purine (A/G) or a pyrimidine with another pyrimidine (C/T) is known as a transition. In contrast,...
17.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Multiscale evolution of the 3D genome.

Trends in genetics : TIG·2026
Same author

The evolution of high-order genome architecture revealed from 1,000 species.

Cell·2026
Same author

Variant Calling in the Dark Genome: Benchmarking SNV Calls in the Flanks of Structural Variants.

Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics·2026
Same author

Highly accurate ab initio gene annotation with ANNEVO.

Nature methods·2026
Same author

A Telomere-to-telomere Diploid Reference Genome and Centromere Structure of the Chinese Quartet.

Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics·2025
Same author

Spatially resolved single-cell transcriptome analysis of murine <i>Salmonella</i> infection reveals the role of distal colonocytes in the inflammatory response.

Gut microbes·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 25, 2025

Author Spotlight: Investigating the Role of Repetitive DNA Misregulation in Cancer Initiation and Immunotherapy Resistance
04:58

Author Spotlight: Investigating the Role of Repetitive DNA Misregulation in Cancer Initiation and Immunotherapy Resistance

Published on: December 13, 2024

3.5K

Read trimming has minimal effect on bacterial SNP-calling accuracy.

Stephen J Bush1

  • 1Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Microbial Genomics
|December 17, 2020
PubMed
Summary

Read trimming offers minimal improvement for variant calling accuracy in bacterial genomics. This study suggests trimming is often unnecessary, saving time and resources in large-scale analyses.

Keywords:
SNP callingread pre-processingread trimmingvariant calling

More Related Videos

Detection of Rare Genomic Variants from Pooled Sequencing Using SPLINTER
14:06

Detection of Rare Genomic Variants from Pooled Sequencing Using SPLINTER

Published on: June 23, 2012

15.5K
Targeted DNA Methylation Analysis by Next-generation Sequencing
08:38

Targeted DNA Methylation Analysis by Next-generation Sequencing

Published on: February 24, 2015

37.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 25, 2025

Author Spotlight: Investigating the Role of Repetitive DNA Misregulation in Cancer Initiation and Immunotherapy Resistance
04:58

Author Spotlight: Investigating the Role of Repetitive DNA Misregulation in Cancer Initiation and Immunotherapy Resistance

Published on: December 13, 2024

3.5K
Detection of Rare Genomic Variants from Pooled Sequencing Using SPLINTER
14:06

Detection of Rare Genomic Variants from Pooled Sequencing Using SPLINTER

Published on: June 23, 2012

15.5K
Targeted DNA Methylation Analysis by Next-generation Sequencing
08:38

Targeted DNA Methylation Analysis by Next-generation Sequencing

Published on: February 24, 2015

37.7K

Area of Science:

  • Genomics and Bioinformatics
  • Computational Biology
  • Microbial Genomics

Background:

  • Read alignment is crucial for variant calling in genomic pipelines.
  • Pre-processing raw sequencing reads via trimming is common practice to improve accuracy.
  • The efficacy of read trimming for variant calling remains debated, with limited systematic evaluations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically evaluate the impact of read trimming on variant calling accuracy and completeness.
  • To assess the necessity and benefits of read trimming in large-scale bacterial genomic analyses.
  • To compare the performance of different read-trimming utilities.

Main Methods:

  • Evaluated four trimming utilities (Atropos, fastp, Trim Galore, Trimmomatic) on 17 Gram-negative bacterial genomes.
  • Assessed impact on SNP-calling pipelines with varying stringencies.
  • Re-analyzed over 6500 public sequencing datasets from E. coli, M. tuberculosis, and S. aureus.

Main Results:

  • Read trimming provided only small, statistically insignificant increases in SNP-calling accuracy.
  • Variant base calls remained consistent (>98.8% for SNPs, >91.9% for indels) with or without trimming.
  • Trimming significantly reduced the proportion of mixed calls, indicating a potential decrease in false positives.

Conclusions:

  • Read trimming offers marginal benefits for SNP and indel calling accuracy in bacterial genomics.
  • Trimming may be necessary only when small differences in call numbers or false call rates are critical.
  • Routine read trimming may not be a practical necessity for many variant calling pipelines.