Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The EcoR V restriction endonuclease.

P A Luke1, S A McCallum, S E Halford

  • 1Anglian Biotechnology Ltd., Colchester, U.K.

Gene Amplification and Analysis
|January 1, 1987
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The identification of chemical intermediates in enzyme catalysis by the rapid quench-flow technique.

Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS·2006
Same author

Exon 3 beta-catenin mutations are specifically associated with colorectal carcinomas in hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer syndrome.

Gut·2005
Same author

Hopping, jumping and looping by restriction enzymes.

Biochemical Society transactions·2001
Same author

DNA cleavage reactions by type II restriction enzymes that require two copies of their recognition sites.

Journal of molecular biology·2001
Same author

Analysis of DNA looping interactions by type II restriction enzymes that require two copies of their recognition sites.

Journal of molecular biology·2001
Same author

SfiI endonuclease activity is strongly influenced by the non-specific sequence in the middle of its recognition site.

Nucleic acids research·2001
Same journal

The enzymes of the BamH I restriction-modification system.

Gene amplification and analysis·1987
Same journal

Structure and function of the EcoR I restriction endonuclease.

Gene amplification and analysis·1987
Same journal

The Pvu II restriction-modification system: cloning, characterization and use in revealing an E. coli barrier to certain methylases or methylated DNAs.

Gene amplification and analysis·1987
Same journal

The organization and control of expression of the Pst I restriction-modification system.

Gene amplification and analysis·1987
Same journal

Mechanism of specific site location and DNA cleavage by EcoR I endonuclease.

Gene amplification and analysis·1987
Same journal

Restriction endonuclease: cleavage, ligation, and sensitivity.

Gene amplification and analysis·1987
See all related articles

Type II restriction enzymes like EcoR I are useful for DNA manipulation and studying protein-DNA interactions. However, EcoR V restriction endonuclease offers advantages for studying DNA-protein interactions due to its higher solubility and crystal availability.

Area of Science:

  • Molecular Biology
  • Biochemistry
  • Structural Biology

Background:

  • Type II restriction endonucleases are valuable tools in molecular biology for DNA manipulation and studying protein-DNA interactions.
  • EcoR I restriction endonuclease is well-studied but suffers from low protein solubility, limiting its use in certain biophysical techniques.
  • Studying protein-DNA interactions is crucial for understanding gene regulation and other biological processes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the advantages of EcoR V restriction endonuclease over EcoR I for studying DNA-protein interactions.
  • To identify alternative type II restriction enzymes suitable for high-concentration biophysical studies.
  • To emphasize the importance of enzyme solubility and crystal availability in selecting model systems for DNA-protein interaction studies.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of Type II restriction endonucleases, focusing on EcoR I and EcoR V.
  • Analysis of enzyme properties, including solubility and crystallization.
  • Comparison of experimental techniques applicable to proteins with varying solubility.

Main Results:

  • EcoR I exhibits low solubility, hindering studies requiring high protein concentrations (e.g., NMR spectroscopy).
  • EcoR V restriction endonuclease presents higher solubility and has reported crystals, making it a more suitable model system.
  • Crystallization of a type II restriction enzyme is a significant step towards detailed structural analysis of DNA-protein interactions.

Conclusions:

  • EcoR V is a promising alternative to EcoR I for detailed investigations of DNA-protein interactions due to its favorable biophysical properties.
  • The choice of restriction enzyme can significantly impact the feasibility of applying various biophysical techniques to study DNA-protein binding.
  • Further research into EcoR V's structure and interactions could provide valuable insights into the mechanisms of DNA recognition by restriction enzymes.