Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Correlation and Regression00:53

Correlation and Regression

2.8K
In statistics, correlation describes the degree of association between two variables. In the subfield of linear regression, correlation is mathematically expressed by the correlation coefficient, which describes the strength and direction of the relationship between two variables. The coefficient is symbolically represented by 'r' and ranges from -1 to +1. A positive value indicates a positive correlation where the two variables move in the same direction. A negative value suggests a...
2.8K
Correlation of Experimental Data01:23

Correlation of Experimental Data

391
Dimensional analysis simplifies complex physical problems and guides experimental investigations, but it does not provide complete solutions. It identifies the dimensionless groups that influence a phenomenon, but experimental data is needed to establish the specific relationships and validate theoretical predictions.
For example, a spherical particle moving through a viscous fluid experiences drag. Dimensional analysis shows that the drag force depends on the particle's diameter, velocity,...
391
Calculating and Interpreting the Linear Correlation Coefficient01:11

Calculating and Interpreting the Linear Correlation Coefficient

7.1K
The correlation coefficient, r, developed by Karl Pearson in the early 1900s, is numerical and provides a measure of strength and direction of the linear association between the independent variable, x, and the dependent variable, y. Hence, it is also known as the Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient. It can be calculated using the following equation:
7.1K
Coefficient of Correlation01:12

Coefficient of Correlation

7.5K
The correlation coefficient, r, developed by Karl Pearson in the early 1900s, is numerical and provides a measure of strength and direction of the linear association between the independent variable x and the dependent variable y.
If you suspect a linear relationship between x and y, then r can measure how strong the linear relationship is.
What the VALUE of r tells us:
The value of r is always between –1 and +1: –1 ≤ r ≤ 1.
The size of the correlation r indicates the...
7.5K
Correlations02:20

Correlations

35.4K
Correlation means that there is a relationship between two or more variables (such as ice cream consumption and crime), but this relationship does not necessarily imply cause and effect. When two variables are correlated, it simply means that as one variable changes, so does the other. We can measure correlation by calculating a statistic known as a correlation coefficient. A correlation coefficient is a number from -1 to +1 that indicates the strength and direction of the relationship between...
35.4K
Quantifying and Rejecting Outliers: The Grubbs Test01:02

Quantifying and Rejecting Outliers: The Grubbs Test

3.2K
Sometimes, a data set can have a recorded numerical observation that greatly  deviates from the rest of the data. Assuming that the data is normally distributed, a statistical method called the Grubbs test can be used to determine whether the observation is truly an outlier.  To perform a two-tailed Grubbs test, first, calculate the absolute difference between the outlier and the mean. Then, calculate the ratio between this difference and the standard deviation of the sample. This...
3.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Why social media research has failed policy-makers.

Nature human behaviour·2026
Same author

Penalized eigenvalue block averaging: Extension to nested model comparison and Monte Carlo evaluations.

Behavior research methods·2026
Same author

Inference for Disattenuated Correlations.

Applied psychological measurement·2026
Same author

Non-parametric Regression Among Factor Scores: Motivation and Diagnostics for Nonlinear Structural Equation Models.

Psychometrika·2026
Same author

Non-parametric Regression Among Factor Scores: Motivation and Diagnostics for Nonlinear Structural Equation Models.

Psychometrika·2024
Same author

Measures of Agreement with Multiple Raters: Fréchet Variances and Inference.

Psychometrika·2024
Same journal

BAYESIAN MIXED MULTIDIMENSIONAL SCALING FOR AUDITORY PROCESSING.

Psychometrika·2026
Same journal

Testing linear hypotheses in repeated measures generalized linear models using external information.

Psychometrika·2026
Same journal

When Do Unifactorial Items Increase the Reliability?

Psychometrika·2026
Same journal

Longitudinal Designs for Diagnostic Models: Identification and Estimation.

Psychometrika·2026
Same journal

Modeling Rare Events and Nonmonotone Nonignorable Missingness of Time-Varying Outcomes and Predictors in Binary Time-Series Daily Diary Data: A Bayesian Selection Model.

Psychometrika·2026
Same journal

Revelle's Beta: The Wait Is Over-Computation Becomes Possible.

Psychometrika·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 24, 2025

Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data
14:27

Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data

Published on: June 26, 2013

16.0K

Partial Identification of Latent Correlations with Binary Data.

Steffen Grønneberg1, Jonas Moss2, Njål Foldnes3

  • 1Department of Economics, BI Norwegian Business School, Oslo,  0484, Norway. steffeng@gmail.com.

Psychometrika
|December 21, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The tetrachoric correlation, used for binary data, may inaccurately estimate underlying correlations if the latent vector isn't normal. This study defines compatible latent correlations when normality is unknown, offering insights for structural equation modeling.

Keywords:
factor analysismodel formulationpartial identificationtetrachoric correlation

More Related Videos

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data
06:35

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data

Published on: July 24, 2010

17.1K
Using Cholesky Decomposition to Explore Individual Differences in Longitudinal Relations between Reading Skills
06:52

Using Cholesky Decomposition to Explore Individual Differences in Longitudinal Relations between Reading Skills

Published on: September 17, 2019

6.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 24, 2025

Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data
14:27

Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data

Published on: June 26, 2013

16.0K
Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data
06:35

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data

Published on: July 24, 2010

17.1K
Using Cholesky Decomposition to Explore Individual Differences in Longitudinal Relations between Reading Skills
06:52

Using Cholesky Decomposition to Explore Individual Differences in Longitudinal Relations between Reading Skills

Published on: September 17, 2019

6.6K

Area of Science:

  • Statistics
  • Psychometrics
  • Data Analysis

Background:

  • The tetrachoric correlation is widely used for binary data, estimating the association of an underlying latent variable.
  • This measure assumes the latent variable follows a normal distribution, which may not hold in practice.
  • Deviations from normality can lead to inaccurate estimates of the true underlying correlation, impacting structural equation modeling.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the range of latent correlations compatible with observed binary data when the underlying distribution is unknown.
  • To determine how much information about the latent correlation can be inferred solely from the data.
  • To explore the impact of partial knowledge of the latent variable's dependence structure on the range of compatible correlations.

Main Methods:

  • The study analyzes the relationship between observed binary correlations and underlying latent correlations under varying distributional assumptions.
  • It identifies the interval of latent correlations consistent with observed data, particularly when marginal distributions are known.
  • Quantification of the effect of partial dependence structure knowledge on the range of compatible latent correlations is performed.

Main Results:

  • The research demonstrates that without additional information beyond the observed data, precise estimation of latent correlations is not possible.
  • An interval of compatible latent correlations is identified when the marginal distributions of the latent variables are known.
  • The study quantifies how partial knowledge of the latent variables' dependence structure influences this interval.

Conclusions:

  • The assumption of underlying normality for tetrachoric correlation can lead to substantial discrepancies from the true correlation.
  • Understanding the range of compatible latent correlations is crucial when the normality assumption is questionable.
  • The findings have implications for the validity of tests assessing underlying normality in statistical models.