Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 24, 2025
14:43
A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
Published on: January 12, 2018
12.3K
Considerations for Developing an Agenda for Gun Violence Prevention Research
1Atlanta, Georgia 30307, USA;
Annual Review of Public Health
|December 23, 2020
Summary
Federal funding for gun violence prevention research is now available. This research agenda aims to understand the problem, its causes, effective interventions, and implementation strategies to reduce firearm injuries and deaths.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Criminology
- Health Policy
Background:
- In December 2019, US Congress allocated $25 million for gun violence prevention research.
- This funding supports research at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the National Institutes of Health (NIH).
- The initiative aims to reduce firearm-related injuries and deaths while respecting firearm ownership rights.
Purpose of the Study:
- To establish a comprehensive research agenda for gun violence prevention.
- To identify key areas for investigation, including problem definition, causal factors, effective interventions, and implementation strategies.
Main Methods:
- The research agenda is structured around four core questions.
- Question 1: Defining the scope of the gun violence problem (incidence, demographics, patterns).
- Question 2: Identifying contributing factors (substance abuse, socioeconomic issues, mental health, firearm access).
- Question 3: Evaluating the effectiveness of prevention strategies (practices, policies, laws).
- Question 4: Determining methods for implementing and scaling up successful interventions.
Main Results:
- The abstract outlines a framework for research rather than presenting empirical findings.
- Key research areas include understanding the multifaceted nature of gun violence and identifying protective factors.
Conclusions:
- A structured research approach is essential for effective gun violence prevention.
- Translating research findings into actionable policies and practices is critical for public health impact.
Related Concept Videos
01:40Archival Research
16.9K
Some researchers gain access to large amounts of data without interacting with a single research participant. Instead, they use existing records to answer various research questions. This type of research approach is known as archival research. Archival research relies on looking at past records or data sets to look for interesting patterns or relationships. For example, a researcher might access the academic records of all individuals who enrolled in college within the past ten years and...
16.9K
02:01Group Design
10.0K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
10.0K
01:56Ethics in Research
25.1K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
25.1K
01:23Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
270
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
270
01:28Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II
940
The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:
940
01:29Bias in Epidemiological Studies
991
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:
991