Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 24, 2025

A Morphometric and Cellular Analysis Method for the Murine Mandibular Condyle
Published on: January 11, 2018
Utility of Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography/Computed Tomography in Suspected Unilateral Condylar
Nadia M Mostafa1, Shaimaa Moustafa2, Marwa T Hussien3
1Lecturer and Consultant of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Clinical Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt.
Purpose:
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the utility of hybrid single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and computed tomography (CT) with technetium-99m methylene diphosphonate in patients with suspected active unilateral condylar hyperplasia (UCH) using histopathology as the reference standard.
Methods:
Twenty-four patients with suspected active UCH prospectively underwent technetium-99m methylene diphosphonate planar bone scintigraphy with SPECT/CT of the mandible. Qualitative and quantitative readings for growth activity were performed by 3 nuclear medicine physicians and the final diagnosis was derived from postoperative histopathological examination. Readings were reported as positive, equivocal, or negative. Total, maximum, and mean counts were recorded for each condyle on SPECT/CT images. The uptake of the index (suspected) condyle was expressed as a count ratio (Rtotal, Rmean, Rmax), a percentage uptake (Ptotal, Pmean, Pmax), background-corrected counts (Btotal, Bmean, Bmax), as well as CT-based condylar diameters (RCT,PCT) relative to the contralateral condyle.
Results:
Interobserver agreement was 0.79 and 0.83 for planar bone scintigraphy and SPECT/CT, respectively, with a total of 5 and 1 equivocal readings from the respective modalities. Surgery was performed in 22 patients; all of them had pathologically proven UCH. SPECT/CT was slightly more sensitive than planar bone scintigraphy (91 vs 78%) with identical specificity (96%). Rtotal, Rmean, Ptotal, and Pmean demonstrated area under the curve between 84% and 86%. Metrics based on CT diameters and background-corrected counts were not associated with UCH diagnosis.
Conclusions:
Quantitative approaches based on total or mean count ratio or relative count percentage were equally predictive for UCH diagnosis; however, they were slightly less sensitive compared with qualitative technetium-99m methylene diphosphonate SPECT/CT evaluation. SPECT/CT evaluation has the potential to decrease the equivocal readings.
More Related Videos
03:41High-Resolution Ultrasonography for the Analysis of Orthotopic ATC Tumors in a Genetically Engineered Mouse Model
Published on: October 11, 2022
06:28Anterior Cruciate Ligament Transection and Synovial Fluid Lavage in a Rodent Model to Study Joint Inflammation and Posttraumatic Osteoarthritis
Published on: September 2, 2025