We need to talk about the analytical performance of our laboratory developed clinical LC-MS/MS tests, and start separating the wheat from the chaff
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 24, 2025

Large Scale Non-targeted Metabolomic Profiling of Serum by Ultra Performance Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry UPLC-MS
Published on: March 14, 2013
Niek F Dirks1, Mariëtte T Ackermans2, Frans Martens1
1Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Endocrine Laboratory, Department of Clinical Chemistry, Amsterdam Gastroenterology & Metabolism, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Abstract:
With the upcoming EU regulation on the use of in-vitro diagnostic devices, a critical evaluation of the current status of our in-house developed LC-MS/MS methods is timely and of great relevance. Recently, much attention has been devoted to the need for better specification of analytical and clinical performance. Appropriate reporting of the actual achieved analytical performance is an important determinant of the clinical performance and subsequent clinical effectiveness of a test. We advocate for the application of CLSI C62-A guidelines for method validation and suggest some adaptations for analytical validation of in-house developed LC-MS/MS methods for endogenous substances. Additionally, we underline the importance of well-equipped reviewers and standardized method description, including the presentation of figural evidence of obtained method performance. Achieving this ensures future quality of our in-house developed LC-MS/MS methods.
Related Concept Videos
High-Performance Liquid Chromatography: Types of Detectors
Mass Spectrometry: Complex Analysis
GC–MS is a powerful hyphenated method commonly used in forensics and environmental...
High-Performance Liquid Chromatography: Introduction
In HPLC, two phases play a critical role in the separation process:

