Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Can Plasma Exchange Be Used to Lower the Circulating Burden of Microplastics in Human Patients?

Journal of clinical apheresis·2026
Same author

Writing manuscripts for peer review.

Journal of clinical apheresis·2024
Same author

Surviving peer review.

Journal of clinical apheresis·2020
Same author

How to write a manuscript for peer review.

Journal of clinical apheresis·2020
Same author

Performance characteristics of the PowerFlow apheresis port: Early experience.

Journal of clinical apheresis·2019
Same author

Optimization of infusional calcium gluconate for prevention of hypocalcemic reactions during therapeutic plasma exchange.

Journal of clinical apheresis·2019

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 23, 2025

A Metadata Extraction Approach for Clinical Case Reports to Enable Advanced Understanding of Biomedical Concepts
07:50

A Metadata Extraction Approach for Clinical Case Reports to Enable Advanced Understanding of Biomedical Concepts

Published on: September 20, 2018

16.2K

Writing scientific case reports for top-line journals.

Robert Weinstein1

  • 1Department of Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA.

Journal of Clinical Apheresis
|December 29, 2020
PubMed
Summary

Clinical case reports, though devalued, remain crucial for generating hypotheses and driving medical breakthroughs. Clinicians can elevate case reports through scientific reasoning and literature review for impactful contributions.

Keywords:
McLeod criteriaacademic medicineclinical hypothesismanuscript writingpublication

More Related Videos

In Silico Clinical Trials for Cardiovascular Disease
09:09

In Silico Clinical Trials for Cardiovascular Disease

Published on: May 27, 2022

2.0K
Multidisciplinary Approach to Obesity Management: A Case Report
05:10

Multidisciplinary Approach to Obesity Management: A Case Report

Published on: May 30, 2025

661

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 23, 2025

A Metadata Extraction Approach for Clinical Case Reports to Enable Advanced Understanding of Biomedical Concepts
07:50

A Metadata Extraction Approach for Clinical Case Reports to Enable Advanced Understanding of Biomedical Concepts

Published on: September 20, 2018

16.2K
In Silico Clinical Trials for Cardiovascular Disease
09:09

In Silico Clinical Trials for Cardiovascular Disease

Published on: May 27, 2022

2.0K
Multidisciplinary Approach to Obesity Management: A Case Report
05:10

Multidisciplinary Approach to Obesity Management: A Case Report

Published on: May 30, 2025

661

Area of Science:

  • Medical Research
  • Clinical Science
  • Scientific Publishing

Background:

  • The traditional clinical case report is often seen as a commodity, relegated to specialized journals.
  • High-impact journals may reject case reports due to concerns about their effect on journal metrics.
  • There is a persistent need for insightful clinical observations to drive medical innovation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To re-evaluate the significance of clinical case reports in medical literature.
  • To advocate for the scientific rigor and potential impact of well-crafted case reports.
  • To encourage clinicians to approach unusual cases with hypothesis-generating scientific reasoning.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of the current landscape of clinical case report publication.
  • Emphasis on the application of scientific reasoning in clinical practice.
  • Utilizing literature review to inform the approach to unusual clinical cases.

Main Results:

  • Case reports, when approached scientifically, can stimulate hypothesis generation.
  • Astute clinical observations can lead to significant medical breakthroughs.
  • Clinicians can make meaningful contributions to high-impact journals through rigorous case analysis.

Conclusions:

  • The clinical case report retains value beyond traditional formats when employing scientific methods.
  • Clinicians possess the capability to conduct scientifically sound investigations of unusual cases.
  • Elevating the scientific approach to case reports can restore their importance in top-tier medical journals.