Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 23, 2025

08:43
A Unified Methodological Framework for Vestibular Schwannoma Research
Published on: June 20, 2017
7.6K
Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Vestibular Schwannomas: Tumor Control Probability Analyses and Recommended Reporting
Scott G Soltys1, Michael T Milano2, Jinyu Xue3
1Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics
|December 30, 2020
Summary
Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and hypofractionated SRS achieve high tumor control probability (TCP) for vestibular schwannomas. Current typical doses ensure over 91% TCP at 3-5 years, but better reporting is needed.
Area of Science:
- Radiation Oncology
- Neurosurgery
- Medical Physics
Background:
- Vestibular schwannomas require effective treatment to prevent neurological deficits.
- Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and hypofractionated SRS (fSRS) are established treatment modalities.
- Understanding the tumor control probability (TCP) is crucial for optimizing treatment strategies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the tumor control probability (TCP) of vestibular schwannomas following single-fraction SRS or hypofractionated SRS (fSRS).
- To correlate dosimetric details with local tumor control rates from published studies.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review of PubMed-indexed studies (1993-2017) reporting SRS/fSRS dosimetric data and tumor control.
- Data extraction on tumor control at 3 or 5 years.
- Poisson modeling to estimate TCP based on equivalent dose in 2 Gy per fraction (EQD2) and number of fractions.
Main Results:
- Analysis of 5162 patients from 35 publications.
- Estimated 3- to 5-year TCP of 95% at an EQD2 of 25 Gy (13.8 Gy single fraction).
- Typical SRS doses (12 Gy single, 18 Gy/3f, 25 Gy/5f) yield >91% TCP.
- fSRS doses of 18 Gy/3f and 25 Gy/5f corresponded to TCPs of 93.6% and 97.2%.
Conclusions:
- Current SRS and fSRS doses for vestibular schwannoma provide high tumor control rates.
- Improved dosimetric reporting and standardized endpoints are essential for future analyses and treatment optimization.
- Further research should focus on detailed reporting to refine TCP models and patient outcomes.

