Perception, Academic Performance, Gender Judgment and Barriers among Surgeons' Career Progression in Jeddah, Saudi...

Gender discrimination continues to be an issue in different surgical subspecialties, especially in Saudi Arabia, where no studies have been conducted so far on female surgeons in academia, on gender discrimination, and on job satisfaction. Considering the increasing number of women enrolling for surgery programs in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, this study aims to examine their perceptions about and equity in working as surgeons.

Following the STROCSS criteria, cross-sectional analyses were conducted of survey data from a multicentric online questionnaire in 2019/2020. A representative sample of medical interns and surgeons (n = 100) from Saudi Arabia responded out of 400 from the 4th iteration.

Females were 53%; most participants were less than 40 years. Women ranked assistant professors were fewer than men (2% vs. 11%). The number of publications by females vs. males was 2.58 +/- 2.68 vs. 11.37 +/- 20.53 (p = 0.002). Surgery was not considered a profession conducive to family life according to more than half the women citing lack of flexible/part-time training or work (26/53, or 49%). However, only 1/5, or 9/47 (19.1%), of men thought there was gender attitude/bias; men also had more variety in surgical career choices. Further, most patients preferred male surgeons ( p = 0.026). Both females (30/53 or 56.6%) and males (25/47 or 53.2%) agreed that the best response to an offensive question was to ignore it. Decision in choosing their specialty was influenced mostly by career and promotion prospects, enthusiasm, and commitment (females: 31/53 or 58.5% and males: 17/47 or 36.2%) with p = 0.026.

The findings reveal the persisting discrepancies based on gender in the surgical field in Saudi Arabia. A nationwide movement limiting working hours, encouraging medical students to enter surgery, and upholding women in leadership positions can help in overcoming this situation.