[Classifications and scores used in digestive endoscopy].

Area of Science:

• Gastroenterology
• Endoscopic Diagnostics

Background:

• Endoscopic report interpretation is qualitative and varies significantly with endoscopist skill.
• This variability hinders accurate interpretation, particularly for general practitioners.

Purpose of the Study:

• To review validated and reproducible classifications, scores, and scales in digestive endoscopy.
• To highlight tools that standardize endoscopic reporting and improve clarity.

Main Methods:

• Literature review focusing on frequently reported and methodologically supported endoscopic tools.
• Analysis of classifications and scales for specific gastrointestinal conditions.

Main Results:

• Identified tools for gastroesophageal reflux, Barrett's esophagus, varices, bleeding stigmata, neoplasms, bowel preparation, and IBD severity.
• These quantitative tools support qualitative endoscopic assessments.

Conclusions:

• Standardized tools enhance the objectivity and interpretability of endoscopic findings.
• Widespread adoption can simplify endoscopic report comprehension for all clinicians.