Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 22, 2025

Identification of Dopamine D1-Alpha Receptor Within Rodent Nucleus Accumbens by an Innovative RNA In Situ Detection Technology
Published on: March 27, 2018
Exploring the structural basis and atomistic binding mechanistic of the selective antagonist blockade at D3 dopamine
Patrick Appiah-Kubi1, Fisayo Andrew Olotu1, Mahmoud E S Soliman1
1Molecular Bio-computation and Drug Design Laboratory, School of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.
Abstract:
More recently, there has been a paradigm shift toward selective drug targeting in the treatment of neurological disorders, including drug addiction, schizophrenia, and Parkinson's disease mediated by the different dopamine receptor subtypes. Antagonists with higher selectivity for D3 dopamine receptor (D3DR) over D2 dopamine receptor (D2DR) have been shown to attenuate drug-seeking behavior and associated side effects compared to non-subtype selective antagonists. However, high conservations among constituent residues of both proteins, particularly at the ligand-binding pockets, remain a challenge to therapeutic drug design. Recent studies have reported the discovery of two small-molecules R-VK4-40 and Y-QA31 which substantially inhibited D3DR with >180-fold selectivity over D2DR. Therefore, in this study, we seek to provide molecular and structural insights into these differential binding mechanistic using meta-analytic computational simulation methods. Findings revealed that R-VK4-40 and Y-QA31 adopted shallow binding modes and were more surface-exposed at D3DR while on the contrary, they exhibited deep hydrophobic pocket binding at D2DR. Also, two non-conserved residues; Tyr361.39 and Ser18245.51 were identified in D3DR, based on their crucial roles and contributions to the selective binding of R-VK4-40 and Y-QA31. Importantly, both antagonists exhibited high affinities in complex with D3DR compared to D2DR, while van der Waals energies contributed majorly to their binding and stability. Structural analyses also revealed the distinct stabilizing effects of both compounds on D3DR secondary architecture relative to D2DR. Therefore, findings herein pinpointed the origin and mechanistic of selectivity of the compounds, which may assist in the rational design of potential small molecules of the D2 -like dopamine family receptor subtype with improved potency and selectivity.
Related Concept Videos
Antipsychotic Drugs: Typical and Atypical Agents
Drug-Receptor Interaction: Antagonist
Antagonists can be classified as competitive or noncompetitive based on their...
The Two-State Receptor Model
The binding affinity of a drug determines its interaction with...
Adrenergic Antagonists: Chemistry and Classification of ɑ-Receptor Blockers
Nonselective α-blockers: Nonselective α-blockers contain haloalkylamine or imidazoline...
Drug-Receptor Interactions
Several parameters, such as the drug's affinity for its receptor and its efficacy, which is its ability to activate the receptor, determine the drug's effect on the tissue....
Adrenergic Agonists: Chemistry and Structure-Activity Relationship
Aromatic ring substitutions: Substituting the aromatic ring with –OH groups at positions 3 and 4 yields catecholamines (e.g., epinephrine), which have a high affinity for adrenoceptors. Hydrogen bonding between –OH groups and receptors enhances adrenergic activity.
Separation of...

