Cystic fibrosis in Tuscany: evolution of newborn screening strategies over time to the present
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 22, 2025

Generation of Human Nasal Epithelial Cell Spheroids for Individualized Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator Study
Published on: April 11, 2018
Matteo Botti1, Vito Terlizzi2, Michela Francalanci2
1Tuscany Support Cystic Fibrosis Service, Department of Pediatrics, Leghorn Hospital, Leghorn, Italy.
Insights
Cystic fibrosis newborn screening (CF NBS) improved significantly with DNA analysis, enhancing sensitivity and reducing recall rates. This strategy is crucial for early diagnosis in diverse populations.
Area of Science:
- Medical Genetics
- Neonatal Screening
- Public Health
Background:
- Cystic Fibrosis (CF) affects approximately 1 in 3000 newborns, necessitating effective newborn screening (NBS) for improved outcomes.
- Newborn screening for cystic fibrosis (CF NBS) enables early diagnosis and treatment, significantly improving clinical outcomes.
- Tuscany implemented CF NBS in 1984, a region with high CFTR gene allelic heterogeneity.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the 34-year performance of CF NBS strategies in Tuscany (1984-2018).
- To assess the impact of incorporating DNA analysis into CF NBS in a region with high CFTR gene variability.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 919,520 screened neonates over 34 years.
- Comparison of four distinct CF NBS strategies: meconium albumin, blood spot immunoreactive trypsinogen (IRT), IRT with lactase assay (LACT), and IRT with CFTR gene DNA analysis.
- Evaluation of sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, diagnosis time, and recall rates.
Main Results:
- Initial meconium-based screening showed 68.75% sensitivity; IRT improved sensitivity to 83.33%.
- The IRT/LACT protocol (1992-2010) achieved 87.50% sensitivity.
- Integrating CFTR DNA analysis (2011 onwards) significantly boosted sensitivity to 96.15%, reduced diagnosis time from 52 to 38 days, and lowered recall rates from 0.58% to 0.38%.
Conclusions:
- The inclusion of DNA analysis in CF NBS is a pivotal advancement, markedly enhancing screening sensitivity.
- This DNA-based approach proves highly effective, even in populations with significant CFTR gene allelic variability.
- Optimized CF NBS protocols contribute to earlier detection and management of cystic fibrosis.
Background:
Cystic fibrosis (CF) is a life-threatening disease affecting about 1:3000 newborns in Caucasian populations. The introduction of newborn screening for cystic fibrosis (CF NBS) has improved the clinical outcomes of individuals with CF through early diagnosis and early treatment. NBS strategies have been implemented over time. CF NBS was introduced extensively in 1984 in Tuscany, a region with 3.7 million people, characterized by a high allelic heterogeneity of CFTR gene.
Aim And Methods:
The aim of the study is to present the results from 34 years (1984-2018) of CF NBS, retrospectively evaluating the sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of the tests. In particular, we studied the impact of the introduction of DNA molecular analysis in NBS in a region with high allelic heterogeneity, such as Tuscany.
Results:
Over these 34 years, 919,520 neonates were screened, using four different NBS strategies. From 1984 to 1991, CF NBS was performed by the determination of albumin on dried meconium (sensitivity 68.75%; specificity 99.82%). Subsequently, the analysis of immunoreactive trypsinogen on a blood spot was adopted as CF NBS protocol (sensitivity 83.33%; specificity 99.77%). From 1992 to 2010, this strategy was associated with lactase meconium dosage: IRT1/IRT2 + LACT protocol (sensitivity 87.50%; specificity 99.82%). From 2011, when the existing algorithm was integrated by analysis of CF causing variants of the CFTR gene (IRT1/IRT2 + LACT + IRT1/DNA protocol), a substantial improvement in sensitivity was seen (senisitivity 96.15%; specificity 99.75%). Other improved parameters with DNA analysis in the NBS programme, compared with the previous method, were the diagnosis time (52 days vs. 38 days) and the recall rate (0.58 to 0.38%).
Conclusion:
The inclusion of DNA analysis in the NBS was a fundamental step in improving sensitivity, even in a region with high allelic variability.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Cystic Fibrosis: Management
Sinus disease and chronic...
Cystic Fibrosis: Pathogenesis
CF is primarily caused by a genetic mutation in a chromosome 7 gene coding for the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) protein. The most common gene mutation leading to CF is the ΔF508 mutation,...
Genetic Screens
Forward genetic screens
Forward or “classical” genetic screens involve creating random mutations in an organism’s DNA using radiation, mutagens, or insertion of additional bases, which...

