Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 22, 2025

05:49
Author Spotlight: Advancing CBCT and Digital Dental Image Integration with AI-Assisted Digitization
Published on: February 23, 2024
1.1K
Positioning errors of dental implants and their associations with adjacent structures and anatomical variations: A
Beatriz Ribeiro Ribas1, Eduarda Helena Leandro Nascimento1, Deborah Queiroz Freitas2
1Department of Clinical and Preventive Dentistry, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
Imaging Science in Dentistry
|January 7, 2021
Summary
Dental implant positioning errors are highly prevalent, with inadequate spacing being the most common issue. Anatomical variations did not significantly impact these errors, highlighting the need for careful preoperative planning.
Area of Science:
- Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
- Dental Implantology
- Radiology
Background:
- Accurate dental implant placement is crucial for successful osseointegration and function.
- Positioning errors can lead to complications and compromise treatment outcomes.
- Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) is a valuable tool for evaluating implant positioning and anatomical relationships.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the prevalence of dental implant positioning errors.
- To investigate the association between these errors and adjacent anatomical structures.
- To assess the influence of anatomical variations on implant positioning accuracy.
Main Methods:
- CBCT scans of 207 patients with 584 dental implants were analyzed by two oral radiologists.
- Measurements included implant-to-adjacent tooth/implant distances and presence of thread exposure or cortical perforation.
- Correlations with incisor canal diameter and submandibular fossa concavity were assessed.
Main Results:
- A high prevalence of positioning errors (82.9%) was observed, primarily inadequate spacing.
- Anatomical variations did not significantly affect the overall error rate (P>0.05).
- A positive correlation was found between incisor canal diameter and implant penetration frequency (r=0.232, P<0.05).
Conclusions:
- Dental implant positioning errors are common, with inadequate inter-implant/tooth distance being the most frequent.
- Positioning errors are not significantly associated with anatomical variations.
- Clinicians must prioritize preoperative assessment of available space for optimal implant placement.

